Quoting Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 842 (1991) (Souter, J., concurring). In re Platsky: court errs if court dismisses the pro se litigant (Defendant is a pro se litigant) without instruction of how pleadings are deficient and how to repair pleadings. So what we are doing is going back and correcting our errors getting verified quotes (where did you get the information.) It’s against the law to give legal advice. By documenting where we get the information we can verify each other notices and correct any errors before sending them off. By two or three witness shall the mater be desided. We want credibility with the people we are dealing with. All facts double checked verified and read as writ before autographing the documents . Notary Publics are reluctant to do what we are doing so be it, yes their signature is worth two a stamp and a signature would you rather have your documents de jure autographed by three people who have real creadability in the freeman movement because of the credentials thy bring to the table or someone you have never met who know nothing of what it is your doing?
Plus we have on line copies of all the notices that member have written. All we are asking is that if you want to goin the private side of the society is send a essay so we can have a signature to verify any notices you do to turn them into a de jure autograph. That way “is’ means “is”” is” as writ.
Check out how to do proper MLA citations
http://library.concordia.ca/help/howto/mla.phpThis
Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right as mentioned in the Criminal Code of Canada.
to this
that a claim of right establishes a lawful excuse and that this factual truth is expressed in Section 39.
Defence with claim of right
"(1) Every one who is in peaceable possession of personal property under a claim of right, and every one acting under his authority, is protected from criminal responsibility for defending that possession, even against a person entitled by law to possession of it, if he uses no more force than is necessary.
Defence without claim of right
(2) Every one who is in peaceable possession of personal property, but does not claim it as of right or does not act under the authority of a person who claims it as of right, is not justified or protected from criminal responsibility for defending his possession against a person who is entitled by law to possession of it. " of the Criminal Code of Canada, and; etc.
to this
that Criminal Code ( R.S., 1985, c. C-46 ) 39.126.127.40.41.42.15., establishes lawful excuse