Greetings
i'll start this thread with my take on magistrate courts....
The purpose, intent and method of the mags court system is murky indeed and if we mostly observe the Golden Rule it is the one we're most likely to experience.
Unfortunately in our ignorance we believe all courts to be places of justice. Punish the bad guy. Compensate the victim. Settle our beefs. We come to realise that this is not so, some easier than others. Of course some or even most never realise it even if they spend their lives going in and out of such places - whether as defendant or Official.
The 'mags' are courts of 'Private-Publication Administration'. They administer the 'Private-Publication Trust'. The Publication Trust is a Private Members Association whose membership roll is the 'Birth Register' and made up of men and women who have agreed (albeit in ignorance) to abandon their rights and contract with the owners of the birth register system by identifying as a surname on a birth certificate - a 'person'. The Publication Trust is made up of everybody's 'personal' property and is a form of communism created (in this era) via Papal Bull Unam Sanctum. Each surnamed-legal-entity-person (aka 'human-creature-that-creepeth) represents a 'Member of the Public(ation Trust)'. Every Birth Certificate issued is a Private-Publication and evidence of claim to a single share in the Private-Publication Trust. One can trade on one's share (law merchant/commerce; UCC), manage one's share (private/ecclesiastic/trust) or one can ignore one's share (idiot/delinquent trustee).
The Publication Trust is a 'Big Estate' (Crown Estates? The 'State?) made up of as many smaller Estates as there are adults who hold evidence of a claim to a share (Birth Certificate). The Big Estate is administered by 'Public' Officials' aka 'Private-Publication Trustees' and we are numbered among such by assuming 'Title of Office' ie 'Mr/Mrs/Ms. and assuming the liability for but not claiming the equity of the ALLCAPS-NAME.
Sometime after the age of fourteen we are offered the chance to 'confirm' our presumed membership of said Public' Trust by signing something - anything! - 'official'. This signals our agreement to several things - we sign everything we own or will ever own (including our offspring) over to Public' Trust and we surrender our Rights for an unknown measure of 'security' at the hands of the greedy. We agree to be bound by and to legislation - code 'law', and agree to play along in the charade of debt as money and the living as dead and we agree to accept and hold Title to Public' Office (ie MR SURNAME).....
....which makes us a Public' Official/Public' Trustee in the form of a 'Lay Trustee to Public' Trust' - (as opposed to a 'Professional Trustee to Public' Trust').
A Lay-trustee-to--Public-Trust is assigned only limited liability as due to his (let's be honest - usually correctly) presumed ignorance of Trust (or indeed any) Law he is considered an idiot who elects to have his share of the Big Estate managed for him by Professional Trustees to Public' Trust. When he flouts Public Trustee Regulations (legislation) he is prosecuted by a Professional Trustee to Public Trust, 'defended' by another Professional Trustee to Public' Trust and 'judged' by yet another. He is offered opportunity to make amends and show competence in resolving the matter (which he could do just by pointing out the inherent conflicts of interest involved). Failure to show competence is considered delinquency in Office Pertaining to Public' Trust and punished accordingly. Then the wealth held in Trust for the man (secret accounts controlled and accessed via the ALLCAPS name), is raided for huge court 'costs'.
The mags courts are tied completely to matters pertaining to the Birth Certificate system via 'in rem' proceedings. The fact they purport to attend to criminal matters is enabled only by their re-defining of the word 'criminal', which as a privately owned concern is their prerogative. If you use a name attached to the birth register AND DON'T REBUT THEIR PRESUMPTIONS! then you are liable to penalty in the mags courts as a delinquent Public' Trustee.
It's all based on fiction and is meant to be based strictly on consent. The fact our consent is given in ignorance only strengthens their position that we are incompetent by way of insanity and our share of the Big Estate must be administered for us by them, and unless/until we demonstrate competence we are stuck with it.
The problem is that we are brainwashed into believing we have to put up with it. We don't.
The form of 'law' used in mags court is private, which means some one or body owns it (the banksters). It's a private club.known as the B.A.R. (Private Membership) Association that runs it. They are run for profit and are allowed to charge the Public' Trust without audit because they own it. Private as in common-law private.
It would seem to be a system set-up to service the 'Public' Debt' aka the 'National Debt' which is technically money the government has borrowed from the people to pay debts incurred to the banksters by treacherous public servants (monarchs, mp's, prime ministers etc who have bankrupted the country several times) but portrayed as money WE owe to the banks.
As a nation operating in bankruptcy anything produced belongs to the Creditors (banksters) and any means of production are subject to control by the Creditors. Every Member of the Public (Trust) is liable to pay off a portion of the Public Debt and the Creditors have the right to enforce that obligation, to force some body to 'act' in settling the 'debt'.
The National Audit Office would appear to be Receivers to the Public Bankruptcy, but it is Parliament that 'Acts' to settle the Public Debt. It produces legislation with the intent to do just that. Legislation is not law but it is contract, and agreement to contract makes the law. This is the basis for the maxim: consensus facit legem.
The Creditors want paying and have complete control over every one who agrees to use their system. Consensus facit legem. So they have their lackeys in Parliament write up legislation - private contracts/agreements ('privileges') specifying penalties for infringements of same and apply same to every 'consenting individual'. Use of their system constitutes consent unless/until you rebut their presumption that you are a 'consenting individual'. Until you do that you agree to pay the Bills by paying for breaching any agreements (contravening legislation).
This system is purely to harvest equity from the gullible ignorant to pay the interest on the 'elite's' debt to the banksters/Creditors. It is not Law and it is not enforceable against one who is recognised as 'Man'. This is why they refuse to recognise 'man' in their places of business - man has no business being there, but if you haven't the wit/will to prove your superior standing via your preceding paperwork then you justify their position that you are incompetent and so subject to their jurisdiction.
The term 'Act of Parliament' is, imo, an abbreviation and it should really say 'Act of Parliament to Settle a Bill', just look at the process:
First a Bill is drawn up, drafted and offered for consideration to Parliament. It is heard and discussed 3 times and if most Members of Parliament agree to its content it is presented to the Queen for royal assent. With her agreement it becomes an act of paliment to settle the bill.
In other words legislation is a collection of commercial agreements and all offences are breaches of contract, making all crime commercial offences and offenders subject to comnercial sanction.
The system as a whole appears to be a massive 'money'-laundering scheme intended to transfer the wealth held in Private Trust for 'man' (ie mineral wealth etc) into the coffers of the Public Trust owned and administered by the banks and corporations.
Technically all one has to do to defeat statute is prove standing as Creditor and Man.
Cheers!