by iamani » Tue Dec 08, 2020 4:43 pm
Greetings
Another rambling sprawl of anagogetymologically-considered musings for anyone bored enough to read it:
Exodus 15:3
King James Version
3 The LORD is a man of war: the LORD is his name.
So... might this mean that the LORD God of Gen 2 is: a) a flesh-and-blood being/man, and: b) a builder of empire, a war-LORD? (Possibly not, because imo the LORD God is a fiction ie the surname-agreement - though i could easily be wrong.) Whereas the LORD God is not mentioned in the KJV Gen 1 seven dei's of 'creation' there seems no specific scriptural reason to assign deity to this character. He doesn't cause the rain to fall, for example. The term 'God' denotes common agreement/consensus/contract/covenant in the KJV as far as i can tell, but even in our tangible realm there is no shortage of historical figures who made claim to god-hood. On the other hand, the Voice of the LORD God (Gen 3) could well be a flesh-and-blood being/man, and a builder of empire... i suspect the (KJV) LORD God is based on the RO-MAN god Mars and corresponds to the astrological sign/age of Aries.
'Man' as an office is and was created (though not necessarily for the first time) in Gen 1:26 (i think) by the 'her-and-him'/'him-and-her' gods. Elohim is plural, and has the feminine value assigned primacy: 'elle' (tangible-reality/woman/physicality), and then the masculine value: 'him' (intangible-reality/man/mentality), even if only anagogically; also there is: YHVH, which considers the masculine first: Y= 'yod', the masculine value, and: HVH= 'he-va-he', the feminine value, which would suggest that the ancient people either saw their deities as hermaphroditic/androgynous, or that they always exist as a matched and balanced pair. Or even both. To quote a hermetic principle: as above, so below; if all on earth exist as matched pairs, then so must the gods. Not coincidentally the hermetic path is all about the joining of masculine and feminine aspects, to move from earthly duality to heavenly dei-ality (if you ask an Irish friend to pronounce: 'duality', you'll hear the word 'deiality'... are they the same word...? Yes, imo.).
As a sidenote on the subject of deiality and hermaphrodism: in the NT two semi-deified characters known as Mary and John deliver Jesus Christ and his message to the world - Mary delivers him in the flesh; and John delivers him to his ministry. Can you remember a time in your own life when Mary and John delivered unto you the means to feel more Christ-like? To more easily love thy neighbour as thyself, and to know thyself, and to fear not...? Try it in (Catholic) Spanish: Marie e Juan. Ring any bells? Invoke 'hazey' memories, perhaps...? It is said that the Christ child receives myrrh as a birthright-gift - this is the anointing oil used by Jesus to heal the sick, and is composed largely of cannabis oil... and hemp has a tendency to hermaphrodism... hmmm...
...and is it not written that when the Christ(-consciousness) returns he will arrive on a cloud...? Pass me the skins, please, any thing's worth a try at the minute.
Incidentally, have you ever wondered how both male and female may be considered 'the bride of Christ'? It's because it represents the substitution of one mental state for another - Man for Christ. That which is tangible ie 'woman', both male and female, remains the same. As per Gen 2, woman (the flesh, both male and female) is the wife (help-meat) of man (the controlling-mentality). Therefore Christ returning for his bride is synonymous with 'the great awakening' where the mentality of man is superceded by a more Christ-like-consciousness.
Anyway, is there any evidence of LORD God (or his Voice/representative) empire building? i would say so, for sure. After all, he completely removes the (caring and desirous) feminine/flesh aspect (rib) from the man/deiality and simultaneously converts the status of man(-ager) of Gen 1:26 from divine-agent/earth-steward/executor to And-God's will, to a mere tool-of-the-mind (mental = men-tool = man-tool?), a 'living soul' (ie a stand-alone benefice, an ecclesiastic fiction of trust-ish law, a feoffdom), ie a feudal-type lord-ship owing fealty to the LORD God and subject to his will. This is where the term 'beneficiary' comes from, and according to my Latin dictionary 'beneficiarii' is defined as 'privileged soldiers' (think: the robber barons). You might want to think about that when claiming status of beneficiary to your ALLCAPS account name, as you may be ignorantly claiming membership to military service as a voluntary and end up being court-martialled!
KJV Gen 2 'Man', as a mere tool-of-the-mind, became (again think: the robber barons, they used full-capacity of man) the means and mental-capacity to ruthlessly inflict and maintain the subjugation of people and others, to enslave and exploit the living on behalf of his 'LORD God' with neither care nor regret and yet remaining (technically) innocent in absorbing not the knowledge of good and evil. The perfect overseer/soldier/feudal-vassal, removed of conscience, empathy and desire (aka humanity). A robotic and obedient mindset, programming for an automaton, a tool-of-the-mind is all 'man' of the LORD God is intended to be, nothing more than an indoctri-nation...
'Man' of both Gen 1 and Gen 2 is a superior office, but every bit as much a dead-fiction as 'person' - the use of the term 'living soul' in KJV Gen 2 tells us this. Man IS a person - but the reason for the higher status than man-made artificial person is... reason! Lord Devlin legally defined 'man' for us - "...a reasonable person is the 《 man 》 on the Clapham omnibus...", ergo man has legal standing/recognition as 'a reasonable person', for no artificial person is endowed with reason. We are not 'man' of Gen 2, we are the 'them' holding office of 'Man'(-agement) according to Gen 1. Look it up. This is what Frank o'Collins work is all about - and it is quite brilliant imo.
Further evidence that 2nd Gen man is designed as an heart-less authoritarian administrator isn't too hard to find, it's all there in KJV Gen 1-3...
Btw, all this stuff about gender-fluidity/alternative-gender-identification is a prelude to the actual removal of the office of 'man' from the world - 'man' is defined by rights to property and contract; remove the rights, remove the man. It's the final cut... we are all emasculated... hew-man/animal is all that's left.
Does this mean the title 'Mr' is to be dropped just as i discover what it means? D'oh!
Magister = synonymous to: master (ma'ster?), chief, principal, superior, vital, boss, head, 'man'-ager, ruler, sovereign, suzerain, (suveran?)...LORD!!!
Mister = M'ister? Missed-her? Mis (-ery) ter (-ror)? Or: Mist-air - as in the Gen 2 mist-and-dust that personifies the fiction of 'man'... hmmmm...?
'Mr' is a contraction of the word 'magister' (ma'ster) for the competent, and 'Mist-air' for the ignorant - at least, that's my story and i'm sticking to it!
i read a comment somewhere recently mentioning a UN-type official function in Spain where the dignitaries of the various countries were sporting new lapel-pins. The old pin was just the flag of the representative's member state. The new one simply says 'Tool of the Mind' - which suggests they label themselves as 'man' of Gen 2 which means: 'living soul', which means: 'stand-alone benefice' (a fiefdom for the privileged soldier); and: 'beast of the (battle) field' which means 'no-humanity' and 'Terror'... a ruthless killer and controller.
...in your feckin' face, or what?!
...and how better to prove oneself as truly heartless, and thus worthy of entry to the hidden establishment (as 2nd Gen. 'Man'), than to abuse/torture/kill children...? M(ind-fuc)K Ultra... if you can bring yourself to do that, all acts of evil are child's play to you... so is this the distinguishing factor between Gen 1 man and Gen 2 man...?
Another twist - 'terror' is phonetically almost identical to 'terra', which means 'earth', and 'terre' which is Latin for 'cow' (as a verb: to terrorise...). Are these El-ites proclaiming fealty to the (and-rogynous) And-God of the earth...? Should they be referred to as Elle-ites...? Or do they swear oath to the apparent terrorist LORD God...? i think we know the answer to that one...
Tid-bits:
(btw, fe = an interest, which makes: female = fe-male = interest-male = commodity)
'Rib' in older version of the text was translated as 'side' - but that might have given us too much of a clue, because it is the flesh/feminine 'side' that was and is removed from Gen 2 man;
When the words 'ribald' and 'ribaldry' are deconstructed you find 'rib' to mean both 'earth' and 'a profanity'; wouldn't compassion be a profanity to a war-LORD...?
Rib = earth = heart-land = humanity = worm-man/work-man/war-man/woe-man = help-meat = us
Roman = Ro + man
Ro = language of fiction
Man (2nd Gen.) = tool-of-the-mind
Ro-man = fictional-language-as-tool-of-the-mind (terror propaganda, fear: F-alse E-vidence A-ppearing R-eal, eg ALLCAPS NAME)
Mossad - by deception we wage war
(...are our zionist-gooz really the Ro-man in disguise? Is the ancient Ro-man empire a complete fabrication...? ....cough-Tartaria-cough-cough... ).
i know this post is bit-ty and lacks flow, but it was either post it now or risk not putting it out at all - and someone might find it useful, so...
Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law