food for thought

Jobaboba's Jokes Factory. (Only for those who are feeling silly)

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Fri Oct 23, 2020 1:19 am

Hi Freeman Stephen

:giggle:

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Sun Nov 01, 2020 7:16 pm

Greetings

Is it solely section 38 of the brexit act 2020 that declares sovereignty of 'the Parliament of the UK' ?

How does that work, then? i mean we can see it written there and we have seen her Maj vacate the palace, board it up and sack the staff, so it seems absolutely possible that convid19 is actually coup-vid19...

...but sovereignty of this country is (or was purported to be) constitutional ie a 'constitutional monarchy', and if queen is deposed we have neither a monarchy nor - in as much as things like the magna carta and bill of rights are dependant upon the existence of the monarchy - a constitution.

As bad as that situation is, the flip side is that all legislation passed this year has been passed by a treacherous-usurping-government in the form of 'the Parliament of the UK' and is null and void. It has no power and now more then ever one's consent is the deciding factor in all interaction with the agents of 'government'. Check out CLC News on YT for the northern shop owner defying the mask mandate, very encouraging!

So we have received public notice: both via brexit act 2020, and c.v. Acts-and-regulations various; that we are undergoing a 'hostile-takeover' with the intent of enslaving we, the people ie public shareholders.

"WHAT DOES “SLAVERY” MEAN?
Slavery is defined in s 270.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) as:

‘the condition of a person over whom any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership are exercised, including where such a condition results from a debt or contract made by the person.’

One of more of the following factors may indicate that slavery is taking place:
- control of movement;
- control of physical environment;
- psychological control;
- measures taken (such as threats, force or coercion) to prevent or deter escape;
- subjection to cruel treatment and abuse; - control of sexuality; and
- forced labour.1"

...short of a specific mention of enforced mask-wearing (cruel treatment? Forced labour...? ) i would say T.H.E.I.R. actions confirm their earlier public notice of intent to enslave  -  or rather, re-enslave...

So who, or what, is  'the Parliament of the UK'...?

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Sat Nov 14, 2020 3:18 am

Greetings

76) The meaning of life is a proper appreciation of Now...

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: food for thought

Postby Freeman Stephen » Sat Nov 14, 2020 9:34 am

The sovereignty of [collectivist HQ] is meaningless to anybody who isnt a high level lawyer or a tv celebrity. If you're not in either of those two priveleged groups, its just a bunch of strangers making the law up as they go along. It was supposed to be a democratic institution and with the advent of working men's rights and womans suffrage, it peaked in its valuableness when every man and woman above 18 and born in the uk had an expectation of representation. This was the gold standard but the gold has been pinched and the people have been given worthless bits of paper with "democracy" written on them and told never to use their paper in any other way than voting for who they are expected to vote for in disregard of reality.

If the laws become harsh, its pointless voting, just ignore the laws like fuck or if you have the balls carry out "a monstrous coup" agaimst the elected prime minister and see to it that the UK's sovereignty continues under the laws of a foreign power. Iran or China or the Republic of Ireland would be nice examples to drive the point home. Such a monstrous coup has a precedent set by the premiership of "Sir" John Major so there has been an overturning of "the law" and activities like this cannot be considered treason so long as they don't go beyond the scope of what John Major did. An action which was a high crime at the time but must be considered to now be lawful for all time to come. An action the discussion of which is hugely censored by those promoting the fake democracy as real!

If the sovereignty of parliament is subject to coups and is considered extant under subjugation and doesn't just make up the law as it goes along but even the meaning of words, its hardly a mainstay of morality and justice but a game of winners demolishing losers in a system where justice is bought and sold and morality means anything they want it mean beneath the coating of whitewash that their system only does good.

Its not my system.

My system was a real democracy with a constitutional monarch protecting it, a system obeyed by public servants with decisions made by ultimately by the voters but this dreamy utopia turns out today to be an illussion that has certainly never existed my entire adult life and may have been nothing more than a story told to children to cover up the essential fact of slavery and servitude in the guise of masters pretending to protect us from their own behaviour.

Given what is, in disregard of what ought to be given what is said which does not add up when "full facts" suggest the opposite of censorship... given what is ... You would have to be deluded by the systems lies or criminally insane to lend it or its adherents any encouragement.

Fore the record:

"Criminally Insane : Unclean mindedness with a propensity toward crime"
"Crime: An action or inaction with an intent to cause injury to another or several others"
"Injury: A deprivation of right"

That injury thing is an interesting one where we share a world with people who claim a right to kill a baby because the system even facilitates it. Consider all lesser criminal insanities where people believe they have rights founded on the injuries against others. Watch the many tentacled squid squirm a million different ways when their unjustness of their unaccountable power is pointed out in a way their fake reality for fake morality hasn't made them deaf to.

Anything with a moral compass will come to peace with those they would enslave, as for those who wont ... they need to have a higher status to impose their will like that arbitrarily. Thats a nice suit and thats some fancy logo on their fancy bits of paper but it appears to amount to a scam ... the big protection racket .. tell the scum that floated to the top to take it to court (a real one where both parties are equal before an impartial judge), or if they don't like the law as you see it, tell them to speak to their MP. If they dont like either of these suggestions, tell them to stand as an MP to get the law changed ...

Mathew 5:18 "For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished."

Now if you find out that you are a light on a hill that can't be hidden and you recall all truth despite the systems lies, you wont be mocking my biblical quotes on the day this embarrassing truth is revealled. Now the squirming squid is turning into a hate squid: The Leviathon exposed! It's propaganda at full saturation and its google greed seeking to turn us into Robotnix' little iron rabbits. They need more power! More power! Recognise it! Ignore it! Tell it to fuck off until it gets more power!

Those who are watched like a light on a hill that even google daren't speak off have nothing to hide ... not so with those on the other side of the electronic surveillance state. They are not accountable to us, nor should we be accountable to them! The law by which all men are equal is something quite distinct from the laws made up by political institutions for those who need more power. Avoid making contracts with the devil if you can!
User avatar
Freeman Stephen
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1409
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:07 am

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Sun Nov 15, 2020 2:08 am

Hi Freeman Stephen

Yes, good advice straight from the heart there.

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Sun Nov 15, 2020 2:13 am

Greetings

Couple of good vids out lately, both very interesting in a similar way. First one: Lord Sumption doing a zoom call from Milan to Cambridge university, about the current nonsense (convid) and the usual nonsense (govt playing fast and loose with 'the law' (ahem!)).

All very encouraging, he's obviously a very learned (and likeable) man and seems like he might be onside. Talks a lot of sense... BUT he either truly doesnt know what's really going on - or he's just another distraction/shill. Gotta be honest, it's the first time i've been slapped with a cog-diss for a few years  -  almost forgot what it felt like...

The problem is that as wonderful as he seems, like i said  -  he's obviously a very learned man. Educated at the places where you learn what is really going on with the human-collateral-financial-system. How law, finance, commerce, government and religion works to harvest the efforts of the riff-raff. He's educated enough to know what the word 'Lord' means, for example, and the fine-detail of the birth-registration-bondage/slavery system. He mentions the brexit act but not section 38 re: sovereignty of 'The Parliament of the UK' and how it offends the constitution - which he also discusses. Tells us how they've made it possible to take us from our homes and section or imprison us, but not one useful bit of info as to how to deal with it. Fear-porn for sophisticates...? i don't know, but i think i'll stick with 'the old man in a chair' over on brand-newTube for now  -  he doesnt do fear-porn, just scary-truth...

Next up we've got the marmite of the truth-seeker scene David Icke coming over all "...common-law-maritime-admiralty-ALLCAPS-birth-certificate-legalese-how've-they-got-away-with-it-innit-terrible..." with a current darling of the scene, John Smith of the Common-law Court organisation. i like John. He strikes me as genuine, i believe in what he's doing, and the potential is enormous. i would recommend at least joining the register  -  it's a good 'un, and numbers really count in this instance...

Now in thirty years of promoting all sorts of supposedly 'crackpot' theories David Icke has not been short of opportunities to expose the workings of the legal system and its antipathy to the common-law remedies (or even common-sense!).  Was he worried about being labelled a conspiracy theorist? A tin-foil-hatter? A nutter? Er... no. Let's be honest, he makes a living out of that.

What David specialises in is rabbit-holes, ie fascinating information on fascinating subjects never-ending. The operative term being: never-ending, these are subjects that are shiny-shiny to catch the eye (and time) of the newly-awakened-and-curious but which it is impossible to get to the bottom of or prove  -  and even if you do, the gleaned info is no good for anything (materially) useful to you, it's a complete waste of time you could/should have used researching that which can improve your status ie the various forms of law that are used to control us. The things you find in such research are both provable and usable against your adversary, and it all leads to a defined goal, the holy grail ie competence.

When you consider the size of his audience, had he taken an interest ten years ago things might be very different now. So why the sudden interest in law, and why specifically the Common-law Court...?

Hmmm...

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Wed Nov 18, 2020 7:15 pm

Greetings

i've said it before...

Anyone interested in personal freedom should pay close attention to the KJV. Tells all. This example is just my current thinking on a possible explanation for these verses:

Revelation 13:16-18 (KJV):

“16. And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: "

'He' being the 2nd beast, the beast of the (corporate?) earth who is operating via the might of the 1st beast, the beast of the (holy?) sea.

So what is the mark? It is threefold. First one is 'in the right hand'  - this suggests the signature, but possibly also the ALLCAPS eg JOHN HENRY DOE, as this is something the individual creates/activates (ask me and i will tell you how)  -  not the Crown/govt as we have assumed. Remember, it is only the surname styled to ALLCAPS on the BC... Also, the mark of the beast can be seen in the Hebraic alphabet as the 'tau'  -  it looks like a cross and corresponds to the mark a farmer would put at the far end of the field to be ploughed as a 'mark' to guide him in a straight line as he drives the 'beast' of burden. 'X' marks the spot, as it were, and the more observant amongst you might have noticed that when you get a speeding ticket at the roadside, the copper will always mark an 'x' where you are supposed to sign... have a think about that, you might be very surprised (tells you why he's not too bothered if you refuse to sign...)

Next up is: '...in their foreheads'. The 'mark' has to be established in your self-identity ie you have to believe the 'mark' is the natural way to identify your self  -  and i'm in the unusual position of having legislative corroboration... i had reason to peruse the P.A.C.E. Act 1984 recently (and my, how it's changed!) and i'd like to draw your attention to section 18 (1), (4), (5) and (5A):

18 Entry and search after arrest.

(1)Subject to the following provisions of this section, a constable may enter and search any premises occupied or controlled by a person who is under arrest for an [F1indictable] offence, if he has reasonable grounds for suspecting that there is on the premises evidence, other than items subject to legal privilege, that relates—
(a)to that offence; or
(b)to some other [F1indictable] offence which is connected with or similar to that offence.

(4)Subject to subsection (5) below, the powers conferred by this section may not be exercised unless an officer of the rank of inspector or above has authorised them in writing.

[F2(5) A constable may conduct a search under subsection (1)—
(a)before the person is taken to a police station or released F3... under section 30A, and
(b)without obtaining an authorisation under subsection (4),if the condition in subsection (5A) is satisfied.

(5A)The condition is that the presence of the person at a place (other than a police station) is necessary for the effective investigation of the offence.]

...do you see it? Read it again. Notice the deliberate misdirection. Do you see how they conduct an unauthorised warrantless search without (technically) violating your rights...? It's so wicked, but one can't help a grudging admiration for the scrivener's art sometimes...

The third? In 'ye olde English' the word 'beast' means 'fear'... do you see anyone around publically displaying a 'mark' of the 'fear' they feel? And telling you to do the same...? Also, man is referred to as a 'beast of the field' in Gen. 3.

"17. And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."

We can't buy and sell under this system AT ALL! There is no money. We trade in and on the debts of each other, nothing ever gets paid. Using T.H.E.I.R. military scrip (pound notes) gives the illusion of buying and selling. Because only merchants buy-and-sell (buy-to-sell) this shouldn't bother us - unfortunately in using the title and/or ALLCAPS and the military scrip we become merchants.

"18. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is six hundred threescore and six.”

A biggie. An actual instruction of how a competent man (him that hath understanding) is to benefit from the 'number of the beast' - and note how the 'name' and the 'mark' don't get a mention here...

"...for it is the number of a man..."

Which man? The clue is in the number given ie 'six hundred threescore and six'. This just happens to be the number used for the tributes received by King Solomon per year ie
six hundred threescore and six talents of... GOLD!

...but what is the instruction? It is for the competent man to: '...count the number of the beast...'

Clue: to count = to hold on account...

...and if the number of the beast is 666 talents of gold then the competent man who knows how to offset his 'expenses' against the 'count' NEEDS NO MONEY! The trick is to do it without accepting 'the mark' and 'the name'...

Something else to consider  -  " I am the alpha and the omega" are words attributed to Jesus as translated from the Greek. However, the translation from Aramaic/Hebraic would be: "I am the aleph and the tau". We've covered the 'tau', so how about the 'aleph'? Well, if we look at its pictographic form it resembles a bull's head ie the 'beast' of burden mentioned in the earlier example. This implies an interpretive translation to be:

"I am the beast and the mark of the beast"

Oh dear... does that mean Christianity is the mark of the beast? That's a deception that could certainly be ranked as 'the great'...

Never mind - i suspect we are soon to receive offer of a new mark, name, number and beast. Check out the link:

https://avoidthemark.com/2020/03/17/what-is-the-mark-of-the-beast/

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: food for thought

Postby Freeman Stephen » Thu Nov 19, 2020 8:12 am

The second beast is an innocent lamb persecuted by the wicked of the earth and cast out, arriving in heaven a lamb with the power of a dragon.

Its the stone rejected by the builders in the seat of life. Its not some legal fiction written down by the people of the earth who say if it isnt written it didn't happen and if it is written it must be so. Heaven isn't some thing made up by the people of the earth like the news reports in the morning star.

The second beast to come out the water sounds more like mid-morning to afternoon star than daystar son of the dawn. Are you looking for stars in the terrestrial sky? Thats not where heaven is. That's not what is meant by the stars of heaven. Heaven is within us.

Consider the square and extrude it by a third dimension into a cube. Now there is an up and a down. The terrestrial stars are up there in the third dimension.
Consider the cube and extrude it by a fourth dimension into a tesseract. Now there is the direction of the heavens and the direction of 'the plane of the earth'.

The 'plane of the earth' is a 3d reality rather than a 2d plane but its called a plane and it stretches into a fourth dimension. Rising above the earthly plane in a place the earth would never believe existed, we have a record of lucifer being warned by god that his intent to rule over the stars in heaven means he is to be cast down.

Up and down are just ways of describing it. The greeks had undead who went to hades, down was up and up was down in their view. The wombles of wimbledon dont give a shit. Underground, overground, wombling free, the wombles of wimbledon, common are we.

Its a just an extradimensional reality the same as any other extradimensional reality.

As for the things written down on pieces of paper on the earthly plane, well the vast bulk of it is profane or at best with its profoundness hidden from those who haven't visited Hotel California yet. The sacred writings are like a bull in a chinashop to anyone trying to keep heaven secret. The ending to the book of Job for example, by Jove! Didnt his friends deserve to be given a cup of STFU by God. What do they know? Legends in their own lunchtime and so eloquent at convincing job to accept the injustice measured against him. This isn't something that lawyers constructed like a legal fiction.

Heaven is something that's going on. Right where you are o thwarted five sense being putting too much faith in the earth and all it says and here you are in a freeman forum telling it straight that the great powers of the earth are talking bullshit.

Make yourself a little crazy. Heaven is flowing through you right now and convinced by the earth you are a five sense being, you dont even realise heaven has been flowing through you your entire life and you were not just born on earth, you were born in heaven on the day of your conception. Your an inter-dimensional energy being in a blindfold. If the blindfold comes off, its going to be mortifying. In heaven, you are in a state like cryogenic suspension. Your emanating energies into heaven just fine. Your life signs are healthy but at the moment, if the button is hit to shut down the cryogenic suspension machine (a metaphor), to take off your blindfold (another metaphor), then the concern is whether you'll arrive in multi dimensional wake up land with your life signs as healthy as they currently are.

The first thing your going to notice is that you are naked. Thats humiliating. Can you handle that? The second thing your going to notice is that all the people you ever fucked over in your life are there wanting to fuck you over back. If it doesnt amount to much its no big deal but the chances of lies and gossip at unimatrix 3 adjunct 4 of your sector of the galaxy ruining your reputation unjustly is probably quite high, so you may have a bit of a struggle getting from cryobooth to the starship galley while keeping your energies shining like the heavens your a part of. This is some water which tastes like pish but it forms things within you like RNA that helps you to attach to other RNA on a journey where you will realise we are all extremely infectious coronavirae shing into a world left out of account.

170px-Lotus_Kirlian.jpg


Spread your light like a fever, and don't you ever come down, Shine on you crazy diamond. You may not know your magical yet but you will see those who want your light snuffed out, to shine the way they want it to and not the way your god wishes you to shine who seems to have given you your body, your soul and placed you as the captain of your own ship.

This is like the button being pushed to heat up the cryochamber and wake you up from "the construct". Theres corruption in the next layer of ... well 'the world' ... avoid what encourages you to do evil, don't get into fights over stupid things like your pride or vanity, don't believe a word of anything, even this I'm saying until you have good reason to believe it, seeing is truly believing and as for the superstitions on the earth plane about the heaven we go to when we die, dont rush to the grave just because you reach the afterlife.

The earth is made of shit. Right now you don't believe the heavens, seek and ye shall find, when you've seen this, you will not believe the earth.

I'm just part of a complicated mystery in a sea of souls. This is voodoo stuff. The force in starwars. The hovership of morpheus. Heaven is not the terrestrial plane. Its not a physical plane but its very real and affects all things. This is not the place of the god of the dead, so dont be drawn toward the grave because the impossible is true and everything they say the truth is, well thats impossible. This is beyond blind faith. When the RNA kicks in the earth should start acting a bit weird. This stuff isnt fmotl stuff. PM me if things start getting surreal. You will be shocked at what it is you've been praying to. You're one of them.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Freeman Stephen
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1409
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:07 am

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Thu Nov 19, 2020 10:47 pm

Hi Freeman Stephen

i beg to differ.

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

Re: food for thought

Postby iamani » Sat Nov 21, 2020 7:39 pm

Greetings

Let's take a critical look at the scrivened-scrawl that is the copper's oath...

The police officer’s oath defines the duties of the police and the arse-covering of same:

I do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve the Queen in the office of constable, with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property; and that while I continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law.

To the uncritical eye all looks legit and above-board, and unfortunately it seems said eye vastly out numbers the critical eye. Look again:

"I do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm..."

All seems good so far, these words are the 'active ingredient' to any oath so far as i know.

"...that I will well and truly serve..."

First problem arises here. This is in a future tense, and non-specific as to what point in the future he 'will' choose to exercise his promise.

"...the Queen..."

Which 'Queen' does he "well and truly serve"? The Queen of England? It doesn't mention her allotted domain or any of her official titles in any way. This is imo hugely important. It could be Madonna, Queen of Pop; or Oprah, Queen of  Daytime Television; or even the Queen of bloody Diamonds in a pack of cards. Queen of Babylon, anyone...? Without specificity the oath is void. Neither does it mention her 'heirs and successors'  -  which would mean that his oath would terminate on the passing (or abdication/deposition... ) of whichever 'Queen' he swore to serve  -  particularly interesting right now, no? The 'Queen' he swore to serve may have died the day after he swore it  -  eg if it was the name of someone's pet cat, who at one point sat in the office-room of a particular constable; when it dies there is no more oath. When was this version of the oath introduced...? The fact it was changed at all is very telling imo. i wonder what the odds are that someone will one day find THE QUEEN corporation listed on companies house or dunne and bradstreet? And will the person of significant control turn out to be the (supposedly sovereign) 'Parliament of the UK'...? Wouldn't be the strangest thing to happen this year. On the other hand perhaps 'Queen' refers to:

"...the Queen-in-the-office-of-constable,..." ?

"in the office of constable" is incorrectly positioned for the apparent grammatical intent of referring to the oath-taker, but more grammatically correct if describing the status of 'the Queen' in this instance  -  though i feel sure she has never graduated Hendon...

"...with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality..."

Good stuff. Unfortunately this only applies when and if he decides to act on his prior 'will' to 'well and truly serve' his mystery 'Queen'... which might explain why police don't seem to employ any of the listed virtues. (Btw, his lack of 'diligence' is currently being used against him by 'Seed Our Future'...)

"...upholding fundamental human rights..."

Looks OK... but can it be perceived in a different sense? Well yes, as a matter of fact it can:

"...upholding fundamental-human rights..."

The 'fundamental-human' would be the biomass represented as the ALLCAPS/ens-legis. Is that you? No... and yes. The biomass/afterbirth (imo aka 'the lamb' in KJV) has your DNA so yes, it is you  -  or rather, it WAS you at one point in time ie your D.o.B. The fact you go on to BELIEVE  the ALLCAPS is still you, tells the copper and magistrate it's OK to fleece you. (Have another look at PACE sec 18 (5A) on my previous post and you should see the trick now if you didn't before.) You create your own reality using the ALLCAPS and/or title...

"...and according equal respect to all people..."

Well that part seems to ring true at least  -  do they not treat us all like shit...? Take note that the term 'people' is used rather than 'persons'. Whereas i am told that the former is not the plural of 'person', i would have to assume that 'people' refers to ourselves in the flesh, blood and bone.

"...and that I will..."

Here we go again - another promise of future performance.

"...to the best of my power,..."

Obvious get-out clause methinks. On a side note  -  do you think any of them get a little thrill when they utter the words: '...my power' ?

"...cause the peace to be kept and preserved..."

We know this does not refer to tranquillity - so whose peace is 'the peace'? It would seem to imply the Queen's (or King's) peace, in which case it refers to the sovereign's obligation to observe and enforce public international law  -  treaties, conventions and the like; it is (imo) this provision that allows him to criminalise what should be classified as mere civil infraction/disobedience. However, the question remains  -  which queen is 'the Queen' ?

"...and prevent all offences against people and property;..."

Yes, lovely, but  -  WHOSE property? We are not interested in 'offences', for such only apply to 'persons' breaching the terms and conditions of their 'person'-al agreement to abide by Acts and statutes etc (an agreement may also be termed 'property' btw)   -  which leads me to doubt my prior assumption as to the meaning of 'people'. In any event, it is actually trespass against ourselves and our property that concerns us.

"...and that while I continue to hold the said office..."

We are, at this point, far from certain that he even holds the office of constable - seeing as the prior mention of 'said office' seems to be ascribed to 'the Queen.

"...I will..."

Sure you will! When, though?

"...to the best of my skill and knowledge..."

Is this just another get-out clause? Or is it fair comment...?

"...discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law."

...but to which 'law' does he refer? More ambiguity. 'Law' is agreement just like 'God' is agreement. Law is contract. Whereas all oaths are sworn before 'God', shouldn't it be God's Law...?

In short: for however long this 'oath' has been prescribed all arrests would appear to be false and unlawful  -  unless you consented/agreed to act as 'Mr/Mrs/Ms/Miss' and/or the ALLCAPS name... the copper really does only have whatever power you give him...

If honesty and clarity are important for an oath to the office of Constable i would say this is closer to the mark:

"I do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I, (name), in holding the office of constable do well and truly serve the Queen of England and her heirs and successors with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding all rights of man and according equal high respect to all people; and that I do, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all trespass against man and his property; and that while I continue to hold the said office I do to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to the law of the land."

...but i suspect T.H.E.Y. prefer the wiggle-room afforded them by the current ill-grammared ambiguous effort they have the cheek to call a valid oath.

Never mind...

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Lighter Side

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests