by iknowmyrights » Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:01 am
Hi Huntingross & Nameless
Thank you both for responding, I appreciate your feedback.
You are absolutely right huntingross, however in the original tenancy agreement no where does it say that the landlord was deceased at that time, or that there was a trust made before he died. They have withheld this information from us for years. It was only recently we found out that our Landlord was deceased, Thus us questioning whom we were paying rent to, and that there actually was not contract, as it is fraudulent. Only our signatures are on the original tenancy agreement.
Obviously they have played the "as you have been living there paying rent like a tenant, then that constitutes as a contract" Card.
Namless:
The last Letter I sent to the Courts, the Bailiff and the Solicitor was this:
xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxGreenxxxxx Kent
xxxxxxxxxxxx
5th September, 2011
Canterbury Combined Court Centre
The Law Courts
Chaucer Road
Canterbury
xxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Sirs,
NOTICE OF REBUTTAL
1. We rebut handing over possession of our dwelling of Green Farm, as we are the Lawful Keepers of Green Farm, and we are in Possession of this property.
2. We the occupiers and Keepers of Green Farm, Rebut the Claimants Warrant for Possession of the property/dwelling known as Green Farm.
3. We rebut that we have received any notice from a CERTIFIED bailiff with a Notice of Eviction.
4. We the lawful Keepers of the dwelling known as Green Farm, Rebut any claim to allow Eviction from the dwelling known as Green Farm. As we are in Lawful Possession of the dwelling known as Green Farm; therefore we are beneficiaries of the Wheler Foundation Charity Trust and we rebut handing over possession of Green Farm to the claimant.
5. Furthermore we rebut the Notice of eviction as it is not signed with a wet ink signature from the courts, or a CERTIFIED bailiff, and bears no county court stamp.
6. We rebut the services of the UNCERTIFIED Bailiff Phil Knowles.
7. We rebut the service of Berwins Solicitors, as they are a third party and there is no lawful contract in existence.
8. THERE IS NO SWORN AFFIDAVIT SERVED INTO THE COURT FROM THE CLAIMANT GIVING SUBSTANCE OF THE CLAIM, THEREFORE THERE IS NO LAWFUL CLAIM.
Notice of Receipt of Order and Offer to Service
DO NOT IGNORE THIS NOTICE
Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent; Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal.
Regarding Reference: Reference CLAIM NUMBER 1CT00508 WARRANT NUMBER Z0000241, your correspondence dated 31st August, 2011.
I write in response to your letter of 31st August, 2011 which informs me that your PRIVATE COMPANY, claiming LIMITED LIABILITY, and actively TRADING AT A PROFIT ON BEHALF OF ITS SHAREHOLDERS has created an Order in favour of some Claimant, and (apparently) against myself.
I am writing to point out that the Claimant (being nothing more than some other PRIVATE COMPANY, claiming LIMITED LIABILITY, and actively TRADING AT A PROFIT ON BEHALF OF ITS SHAREHOLDERS) had no right whatsoever, under the Common Law-of-the-Land, to make any such demand (of anyone). And that your Company did not have my consent to use the Arbitration Services you offer. This renders your Order TOTALLY UNLAWFUL, as things stand.
In short: Until you can show some LAWFUL obligation on my part, I do not CONSENT to TRADE with either Company.
Nevertheless I may still be prepared to go ahead and service said Order, provided that it takes place under normal business practices. Thus, since any Order is chargeable, and the rate for servicing is set by whomsoever services said Order, I hereby give you Notice that my fees for doing so will be £500000 in excess of the amount you have Ordered.
Are you prepared to pay £500000, in excess of the amount of your Order, such that your Order can be serviced? Your Company, after all, made the Order, did it not? And you are requesting payment, are you not? (Together with UNLAWFUL threats and menaces, I might add). If I do not hear back from you within ten (10) days, then I will assume that you do not.
Otherwise please send a cheque for the amount of your Order, PLUS £500000 (cash with Order are the terms), and - once your cheque has cleared - I will service your Order immediately.
(Please note, in case you are confused: Enclosed with this Notice you will find pages headed "Arbitration", "Statutes" and "Orders". These define the position under the Common Law-of-the-Land, and hence your Company's position, in reality. It's all quite simple really. If your Company ordered, say, stationery, then it would expect to pay the Supplier, at the Supplier's rate).
Unless your subsequent communication accepts my Offer to service your Order, I hereby give you Notice that any other communications in this matter - which you have raised without my consent - will cause me to apply fees at the rates quoted below, for which - by contacting me - you agree to be liable by 'performance':
FEE SCHEDULE
Telephonic conversations: £40000/hour or part thereof.
Emails: £20000 for each and every instance.
Letters: £200000 for each and every instance.
Research: £10000/hour or part thereof.
If it should be necessary - due to your non-contractual insistence - for this matter to be raised in any future court, you agree to be liable to pay for my time away from home at 100/hour, plus travel, food and accommodation expenses.
Yours sincerely without ill-will, vexation or frivolity,
User: of thSignature family
Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all Natural, Inalienable Human Rights reserved.
1. Enclosure "Arbitration".
2. Enclosure "Statutes".
3. Enclosure "Orders".
"Focus on where you want to go, not on what you fear.
As it is your decisions, and not your conditions, that determine your destiny."