In principal, for the moment ignoring time or geographical constraints, would you be willing to:-
A. Participate in the organisation and ground work of establishing a court de jure.
B. Be an active participant in a court de jure, juror etc.
C. Use a court de jour to find remedy for your injuries
A common law crime is also a statutory crime but a statutory crime is not necessarily a common law crime. Therefore a common law court takes precedence over a de facto court. Why are we bothering with combat on their territory when we can attain superior justice on ours?
How do we attain proper recognition of this court?
For the un-initiated, a de facto court (statutory) is a legal fiction, a convenience and we all know how inconvenient convenience can be at times. A court de jure is a common law court composed of 12+1 people: 12 jurors and 1 spokes-human/administrator/adjudicator who is there to keep the order of the court. The real decisions are made by the jurors who should all be peers. Traditionally, these peers would all know the participants and so could make rulings based not only upon law but also upon compassion with respect to the experience and character of those being judged. Rulings can only be made on crimes that have occurred, not on crimes that "might" occur as is the case with de facto law.
A de jure court should also have the ability to monetise financial instruments
Following on from this, we would need a common law peace force to enforce the courts decisions.
If you think this is a way to go, please create a link from other sites that might be interested too. If you post such links here, there will not be duplication.
AD
I have edited the change where I can. I double checked, I had done the scroogle search (google without the cookies, adverts or info storage.) under the correct spelling but my creative side took over when I was writing. 
