Hey up FMOTL ers
Here is my latest angle on things
Citizenship or our relationship with the state is NOT CONTRACTUAL, if it was there would be an offer of services in exchange for a known amount. Because we are designated UK Citizens without any contract, it is an infringement of the fundamental rights protected by the UN Covenants and the State constitution and human rights act. So you want to address that infringement with the court or claimant.
You have to bring attention to the differences between a Humans rights and those granted to citizens. Acts are laws, contracts are laws, membership of a Society should be contractual, but is not at present. So our human rights are infringed by the state and we have a right to remedy.
The State cant prescribe the actions of a human being, the don't have the right to tell you what you must do or not do beyond the common law crimes which infringe on anothers rights. When they say you are a citizen and must register your car, they have denied you freedom of association and freedom of property. The Courts should recognise this and offer a remedy.
We have the right to work, but they may not oblige us to work. In no case may a peoples be deprived of its means of subsistence. That is your wages. They have the right to raise taxes. They don't have the right to take your pay, a remedy should be available. They send you a bill, you get it discharged. UK Citizens are a peoples, accept it and use the remedy available.
A human has the right to life, food, clothes, a home, travel and continued improvement of living conditions and they may not deny us those things. A citizen is entitled only to benefits, the dole, which rarely covers the basics never mind any improvement.
We do not have the right to pick and choose which rules we follow, maybe not, but we have the right to challenge anything that infringes on any human right. The challenge would end with a constitutional challenge, to challenge the relationship between human and state. Whilst an Act may be enforced as law it is not necessarily lawful, they do get struck down and they do have remedy clauses within them. The court assumes they comply with international obligations. It is up to us to point out when they don't.
Maybe your remedy is within the constitution act or the Human Rights Act. Person, peoples, individuals, are all different things. You may well be more than one of them. A human and a citizen a person and also part of a peoples. The Magistrates yesterday said as far as they are concerned the name is mine. If you don't use it you don't get a hearing. I still think it maybe legal titled held by the Queen. They said they do recognise that I am a human being. A remedy to the tax bill (payment in lieu) is not an issue at a liability order hearing.
Half or their power comes from going to court wastes an entire day and is pretty unpleasant, most people don't ever want to go back. They feel beaten but have missed the point. They don't understand what the law says. It says if someone infringes on any of your rights you are entitled to some sort of compensation.
Namaste