Victimless Crime

Victimless Crime

Postby huntingross » Mon Mar 13, 2017 2:19 pm

Victimless Crime / Racketeering / Extortion / Scams / State monopoly on violence / State mercenaries / Highwaymen.

--s--

Glossary of terms.

Quote “Those who rob Peter to pay Paul”

Those who rob = Government / Crown

Peter = You / The victim.

Paul / State mercenary / Highwayman / Crown officials = Those in the employ or service of the robber.

State mercenary / Highwayman = Police (including militarised)

Scam = Fraud.

Protection racketeers = Government / Crown

Protection racket clients = The people / You / The victims

--s--

To me, this information is so important I will place the conclusion in the opening gambit following the accepted definition of the syndrome. The detail if you’re interested or sceptical is set out beneath.

“A victimless crime is a term used to refer to actions that have been made illegal but which do not directly violate or threaten the rights of any other individual. It often involves consensual acts, or solitary acts in which no other person is involved.”

"Victimless crimes are in principle "victimless" from a position that considers the individual as the sole sovereign, to the exclusion of more abstract bodies such as a community or a state against which criminal offences may be directed."

So you are the sole actor in a play in which you didn’t know you were the star. You are the criminal in a crime that offended no one.

You believe that everyone is sincerely making these claims against you are honest law abiding people. You trust them to tell the truth.

So here is the conclusion. They are the perpetrators of a huge lie. A conspiracy if you like. They are the criminals. You are the victim. It’s true that every crime has a victim.

IT’S YOU.

--s--

My comments on victimless crime are specific to so called traffic offences but the syndrome most likely applies equally to all other versions of the same scam of ‘victimless crimes’. One day I may consider this proposition too and expand upon it.

It is said that “attack is the best form of defence”. Their attack is their best defence against exposure of the huge scam they are perpetrating on the people.

If you don’t believe this information, its not because it isn’t true. Its because you’re not ready. There are five stages of acceptance – denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. You may embark on this journey, you may already be on it, but unless you’re prepared to accept that everything you hold to be true is most likely a lie then you will never start down this road. Once you know something, rather than what you believe or take on faith, you will never be ignorant again.

A scam on this scale is of epic proportion and that alone makes it hard to comprehend the possibility of it being true. But remember this, the things you take for granted were not always held to be true. The earth was not always considered to be globular and the Sun wasn’t always at the centre of the universe. These accepted facts may once again be redefined in the future and held to be self evident at that time. Be ready to accept that things are seldom as they seem.

--s--

Why are they the criminals ?

People have a constitutionally protected right of passage. The constitution in Britain is made up from case law, statute and tradition. Moreover the founding document (constitution) of the British parliament, The Acts of Union, has no Article allowing repeal of the Act. These are 25 entrenched Articles to protect forever the people of the Union against the excesses of Government.

Your constitutional rights at a glance –

Act of Union 1707. Article 4 “That all the Subjects of the United Kingdom of Great Britain shall from and after the Union have full Freedom…….to and from any port or place within the said United Kingdom”.

Act of Union 1707. Article 25 “all Laws and Statutes in either Kingdom so far as they are contrary to or inconsistent with the Terms of these Articles ……shall from and after the Union cease and become void”.

Wills J. said in regard to public right of passage "The only 'dedication' in the legal sense that we are aware of is that of a public right of passage, of which the legal description is a 'right for all Her Majesty's subjects at all seasons of the year freely and at their will to pass and re-pass without let or hindrance.' ". Ex parte Lewis (1888) 21 Q.B.D. 191.

Lord Slynn reiterated Ex parte Lewis (1888) 21 Q.B.D. 191 Wills J said that a public right of passage is a "right for all Her Majesty's subjects at all seasons of the year freely and at their will to pass and re-pass without let or hindrance.". DPP v. Jones and Another [1999].

Lord Evershed M.R. said, at p. 259: "The rights of members of the public to use the highway are, prima facie, rights of passage to and from places which the highway adjoins;”. Randall v. Tarrant [1955] 1 W.L.R. 255.

To relinquish your rights you have to consent. If you are removed of your rights it will be by deceit or force. Once you are aware that a deceit has been perpetrated, your rights return to you by simply acknowledging the deceit and taking them back, with force if required.

And here is the rub. The state has a monopoly on force. If you stand up for your rights they will stamp on you. If you stamp back…they can and will stamp harder.

Some of you may be throwing your hands up at this point with my comment about “standing up for your rights” and the many brave people that have done this with success. To be clear. Success in this area has been on ‘civil rights’, the privileges granted by Governments. Civil rights are not real rights, they are made up. For example, the right to vote. A government grant to keep the people engaged in a process that never delivers what is expected from that engagement.

There are two divisions of people in the context of this subject.
•There are people involved in organised crime including the unwitting servants to that end. Governments, Mafia, Police, Courts etc. and
•The victims of organised crime.

People involved in organised crimes fall broadly into two categories.
•Primary psychopaths, estimated at 4% four percent of the population.
•Secondary psychopaths who could number as high as 20% twenty percent of the population.

Secondary psychopaths are the foot soldiers of the primary perpetrators. They justify what they are doing in a whole manner of ways to excuse what they know to be wrong. This is the function that allows them to ‘sleep at night’. Primary psychopaths make no such justification.

The quote attributed to Stalin, “useful idiots” applies to all people who are prepared to rationalise immoral behaviour as “just following orders”.

Incidentally, there is a test you can take to determine if you fall on the psychopathic spectrum. Check it online if you’re curious.

--s--

Epicycles are the ‘patches’ placed over the ‘holes’ in prevailing theories. They shore up, prop and support the theory that is starting to unravel. The prevailing theory isn’t necessarily malicious in its proposition, it is probably an innocent attempt to rationalise our world. But when it is clung to in the face of contrary overwhelming evidence then bad things usually happen to those that are trying to better explain the deficiencies in the theory.

Take for example, “the earth is the centre of the universe”. Innocent enough. Man trying to explain and understand our position in the order of things. When observations started to see problems with the theory, epicycles tried to explain these in a way that maintained the paradigm. They became more and more convoluted. Finally the only obvious theory put the sun at the centre of the universe and all the epicycles fell away to reveal this as the simplest explanation.

Once you accept there is always a victim in crime, then you have to consider that someone is lying to you when you hear the phrase “victimless crime”. It took me a while to reconcile the peoples constitutional protected right of passage with prosecutions in the legal system for exercising that right which includes the epicycle of victimless crime. The answer was so obvious and hidden in plain sight one can only sit back and say of course. It all becomes simple at that point.

A huge lie to keep the people in place. Paying into a massive worldwide scam that we’re told is in the “public interest”. Like so many (probably all) government edicts, the “writing on the tin” is the opposite to the intent.

Take for example –

‘Criminal Justice’ its not where criminals get societies justice, its where the justice is criminal. Criminal is the adjective or

‘Social Care’ its not care for the vulnerable, its where the vulnerable are institutionally abused. Think of forced child removal into a state funded foster system and you’re getting closer to the truth. Where parents forced through ‘Family Courts’ can’t speak of the institutional injustices for threat of being imprisoned.

And honestly. What can you expect from an organisation which by any ‘observational definition’ is corrupt, immoral and criminal to its core. Look up the ‘real’ definition for government and it will not be the same as what you observe.

--s—

How did we get into this situation ?

We lived in small communities where we placed certain members of the community into trusted positions to better administer the ‘common good’.

Communities grew and coalesced and the link to these members became more tenuous. We didn’t know them directly. But the common good was still being administered fairly and as expected. Mostly.

It really fell apart when the Romans pitched up and the rest is history. The price of their settlement of Britain is massive. The benefits are undoubtedly enjoyed to this day but it was all premised on an arrogance of superiority and then as now the trusted positions were filled with greedy self interested people who know nothing of common good, nor do they care. They do the bidding of their ‘superiors’, the primary psychopaths.

Organised crime and therefore organised criminals work together to ensure their continued benefit at the expense of the victims. Those that are not criminal or organised.

It makes perfect sense for them to create a ‘legitimate’ strand to their business to counterpoint their ‘illegitimate’ business. It’s the same notion as ‘no good without evil’. Governments exist to legislate against criminals which increases the business market for the criminals. If you consider it to be two distinct entities it is a symbiosis but in fact it is really one organism designed to constantly oppress the unorganised people.

If it was two distinct entities there would be no persecution of the people they are trusted to serve. There would be no legislation that criminalizes the people where there are no victims. It is self evident.

Legislation does not prevent crime. If it did, there would be no crime. It keeps the law abiding within the fence. If you transgress, you’re a criminal in a crime with no victim. Public opinion and peoples eagerness to please the community in which they live and work ensures most people never transgress either by accident or intent. Any accidental transgression is considered to be their fault for which they must atone. It is self policing for the criminal overlords requiring almost no intervention. This is how a large population can be managed with such a small army of militarised state mercenaries.

--s--

Its all upside down.

Nearly all people are so well conditioned by years of relentless indoctrination, they never even stop to contemplate who is the victim. They are being charged with an offence and they adopt a position of defence, but who have they offended. This is the birth of the victimless crime. The charge is the attack their response is to defend.

Who coined the phrase ? We’ll probably never know. But it is certainly a clever introduction of a phrase to describe the situation into which you are now being sucked. Probably introduced by the very organism that is perpetrating the scam. Their attack is their best form of defence, and its been working for centuries.

Honed and perfected from one money grabbing scam to the next until we have the perfect highway robbery scam. The state has side stepped the whole issue, and we have allowed them. The scam is a protection racket to extort money and compliance from the traveller in true highwayman style. But on steroids.

A highwayman will stop you, threaten you, take your stuff and never be seen again. The state will stop you, threaten you, take your stuff, threaten you to come to court, take more of your stuff, punish you with more threats and kick you out in the street. Any hickup in your payment plan and you will be threatened again. They are relentless. At least with a robber, you have the opportunity to beat them off. Try that with the state and you will be severely beaten by their highwaymen and punished even harder and have even more stuff taken.

The State is a well funded and well organised criminal syndicate. It perpetrates various scams and rackets against the people to extort money and ensures compliance through well motivated, well funded and well trained state mercenaries who always hunt in groups of two or more. Additional mercenaries can be called upon with alarmingly fast response times to ensure any resistance is quickly subdued. The highwaymen operate through a network of teams, have state of the art communication and recording technology. They will forcefully demand submission if required, this force being condoned as necessary and any attempted defence to these advances is considered criminal in itself which exacerbates the worsening predicament.

This soliloquy takes the most accepted descriptions for the topic headings and directs them in the consideration of traffic offences.

A victimless crime is a term used to refer to actions that have been made illegal by statute. Some of these laws produce secondary crime, and all create new 'criminals' many of whom are otherwise law-abiding citizens, even people in authority.

Criminal penalties for victimless crimes create monopoly profits for the state. This crime tariff encourages the growth of sophisticated and well organised scams which proliferate and diversify into other areas of crime against the people. These large profits provide ample funds to ensure complete loyalty of the 'useful idiots' in keeping the people in place under the burden of the state. The robber of Peter to pay Paul can always rely on Paul.

The state which was created by the people for the convenience of the people is now a rabid dog, biting at the hand of its master.

Consider the driving licence. People have the constitutionally protected right of passage without let or hindrance. This right is relinquished when we apply for a driving licence and we accept the privilege in exchange. Everyone should appreciate and understand rights can not be taken under colour of law, they can only be surrendered or taken by deceit. Privileges are granted by the issuing 'authority' (and I use that term extremely loosely) and can be revoked for any reason deemed necessary to maintain their 'authority'.

If you are caught driving without a licence, you will be prosecuted under the Road Traffic Act, fined and your licence will be endorsed with points. All this is to fund the criminal state under the pretence of punishing you to behave better in future and to respect of your rabid dog master. As you will have gathered by now, the crime for which you were processed was victimless. The racket is a protection racket. Pay for your licence, follow the rules and you will be safe from the state mercenaries. Disobey and you will be extorted and subjected to the states monopoly on violence.

Take away the requirement for a licence. There is no crime, there never were any victims after all. No money will be extorted by the criminal state under any pretence. And the people will return to their constitutional right of passage without let or hindrance. The solution is simpler than you expect. The driving licence was introduced in 1903. The criminal institution that deprives the right of passage is built on that single foundation.

--s--

Rackets.

“A racket is a service that is fraudulently offered to solve a problem, such as for a problem that does not exist, that will not be put into effect, or that would not otherwise exist if the racket did not exist.”

Conducting a racket is racketeering. The racket exists as both the problem and its solution and is used as a method of extortion. The most common example of a racket is the "protection racket".

Normally a protection racket is considered to be a scheme whereby a group provides protection to businesses or other groups through violence outside the sanction of the law. It should be clear by now that the state racket operates expressly within their sanction of law. Through the credible threat of violence, the racketeers refrain from swindling, robbing, injuring, sabotaging or otherwise harming their clients. When their clients fail to maintain their monthly subscriptions the state funded mercenaries are unleashed with the credible threat of violence.

Protection rackets are often indistinguishable in practice from extortion rackets.

Protection racketeers establish what they hope will be indefinitely long bonds with their clients (sound familiar ? Government / People). This allows the racketeers to publicly declare a client to be under their protection (Foreign Governments know to stay on their turf. Unless you’re one of the Big Four. Russia, United States of America, United Kingdom, France, then you do pretty much what you want with impunity). Thus, thieves and other predators will have little confusion as to who is and isn't protected.

--s--

Extortion

Extortion is a criminal offence commonly practiced by organized crime groups to obtain money, property, or services from an individual or institution, through coercion and should be distinguished from robbery.

In robbery, whether armed or not, the offender takes property from the victim by the immediate use of force or fear that force will be immediately used (as in the classic line, "Your money or your life") Extortion, which is not limited to the taking of property, involves the verbal or written instillation of fear that something will happen to the victim if they do not comply with the extortionist's will. Another key distinction is that extortion always involves a verbal or written threat, whereas robbery does not.

The term extortion is often used loosely to refer to everyday situations where one person feels indebted against their will, to another, in order to receive an essential service or avoid legal consequences.

--s--

State mercenaries / Highwaymen

The police do the bidding of their corrupt overlords by enforcing Parliamentary rules to keep the people fenced in.

Like all secondary psychopaths they justify their actions to hide the immoral things they do every day to ‘keep the peace’. They are supposed to question immoral orders but never do, they have to work with all the other mercenaries every day and they possess this mistaken notion of brotherhood. Looking out for each other against the criminals.

To follow orders because your ‘superior’ told you to is the sign of a weak mind, when those orders are immoral they should be disregarded and ignored. To implement them is the worst kind of cowardly behaviour.

They prey on people every day, lying in wait, hiding in lay-bys, waiting around corners ready to pounce and chase their prey down. The highwayman is alive and well and found gainful employment for the state robbers. They stopped being lone individuals and became part of the organised syndicate. The pay is constant, the hours are predictable, you don’t get shot at anymore since they outlawed guns. Business is fine.

Any state mercenaries that are caught ‘over stepping’ the accepted boundaries of violence against the people seldom suffer any jail time. They get swept away to reappear when the dust has settled or find gainful employment in the growing private sector security companies, where their skills are considered superior to their civilian counterparts.

--s--

mark@sovereign-state-fidach.com
https://sites.google.com/site/markjenningssovereign/blog-spot
Success nourishes hope
User avatar
huntingross
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4324
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:29 pm
Location: FIDACH, Near Edinburgh

Re: Victimless Crime

Postby MikeThomas » Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:15 am

Thats a great read! Thanks Mark :yes:

BTW: Check out the blogspot :yes:
We are the people our parents told us NOT TO PLAY WITH
User avatar
MikeThomas
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1631
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:17 pm
Location: Llanharan, South Wales

Re: Victimless Crime

Postby iamani » Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:58 am

Hi huntingross

i agree. Good post. Thanks.

Cheers!
law is all is love is all is law
iamani
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 5:06 pm


Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest