All UK statutes since 1911 void

Discuss the difference between Common Law and the Statutory Acts made by the Powers that be, (PTB)

All UK statutes since 1911 void

Postby whistleblower » Wed May 05, 2010 6:59 am

The fact is that the way the United Kingdom is currently governed is in total violation of our constitution…..not only by the fact that they are illegally taking away the power of the Monarch and its citizens by falsely handing this power to a foreign nation. They continue to hand out billions of taxpayers money and then demand to tax us even more…this is in violation of our historical constitution.

I thought I would leave the rest of this article to the words spoken by other good British Citizens who did care and did not sit back in their armchairs, like most of us and just accept what our government is telling us.

My first dedication must go to Mrs. Elizabeth Beckett who worked tirelessly in defending the constitution of the United Kingdom. I find her work so interesting especially when she applied her knowledge in advising readers in the US about the American Constitution. The following is an extract from the Namaste Magazine Vol 10 Issue 2:

As far as the American Constitution is concerned, Jefferson and co made a Masonic Constitution, but they did not wipe out the existing British Constitution on which the colonies had lived for two hundred years. This is the basis of your law and customs

The English Constitution includes:

1). Magna Carta, (which the Supreme Court used for the release of the people in Guantanamo Bay

2). The Petition of Right 1627

3). The Bill of Rights of 1689

4). The 1700 Act of Settlement

These legal statutes were made by the people from whom the colonies are descended, only rubber stamped by British Parliament, (governing the colonies at the time) until independence. It is the basis of your Law and your Constitution. The United States Constitution is subject to the British Constitution.

The only elements of the US Constitution that differ from the British Constitution is the royal prerogative and Christianity. The prerogative can exceptionally be used by the President, but is not part of the law as it is with us in the UK. However, the people of the USA cannot rely on the 'prerogative', all they can do is find the relevant phrases that can fight orders. These can be found in the Bill of Rights 1689 and chapter 29 of Magna Carta. Good luck.

I think Elizabeth was a remarkable lady and it is rather sad that this fine lady no longer graces our planet. She was an extremely strong woman with values and having a father as a High Court Judges obviously instilled in her that one must do what is right and not go along with the flow. Here is more information on her stance from the same source:

Mrs. Elizabeth Beckett’s legitimate Constitutional stance against an illegal tax system and treasonous government. A story that should be on the front page of every newspaper, but has remained unreported! This amazingly selfless lady has studied the British Constitution in great depth. Her initial interest in the law began when she was a District Officer’s wife in India where her father, a High Court Judge for many years, was party to drawing up the 1935 India Act of Independence.

Elizabeth was summoned to appear in court at Carlisle, a distance from her home of approximately 55 miles. Without hesitation or complaint, this remarkable 83 year old lady, who in her own words ELIZABETHis lame, (she cannot walk very well without aid, due to a painful hip), took a taxi on her own, to the court where a judge listened to her appeal against a threatened bankruptcy order by her local council, for refusing to pay her Council Tax. Her refusal was based on the following objections: “It is illegal to pay a tax to destroy my country.” Later she discovered just how illegally councils are acting.

Elizabeth has received very little mainstream media reporting, the little she has had has only been at local level. Nationally, the BBC televised 30 seconds on the Politics Show. Even though she was interviewed by a reporter, the BBC editor refused point blank to broadcast her interview. It was withdrawn. We ask, could this be because of the influence of Common Purpose?

Namaste has tried to present Elizabeth’s story to various national newspapers: They were not interested. In fact the News Desk of the Daily Mail in Manchester thought our information about Elizabeth’s Constitutional Rights and the Act of Treason committed against the people of the British nation was far fetched! They put it to the News Desk that we do indeed have a Constitution. This was also dismissed. They ask, could this be because of the influence of Common Purpose?

I am happy to say that despite the British Medias refusal to covering this story (as they did with Hollie Greig); we are more than happy to always reveal the truth. When one continues to read about such cover-ups it makes the decision to vote that much harder. The three mainline parties have so much dirty washing to hang out one cannot trust them to run our country. Their policies are so much aligned to the New World Order that one must never allow them to succeed.

Again I will use more information from Namaste in order to give them the media coverage they deserve:

It is quite clear that we are dealing with mindset which is at best totally ignorant and, at worst, working deliberately to subvert our ancient Constitutional history - The Birth Right of the People of England, (1700). This is still the law of the land today! How could this happen? The plan has been carefully contrived. The journalist Stewart Alsop wrote: “Knowledge is power and power is the most valuable commodity in government. So whoever knows the secrets controls the knowledge and therefore holds the power...”

This would help to explain why Harold Wilson removed the teaching of the Constitution from the British education curriculum, in the 1960’s and 1970’s. Today, Britain’s universities DO NOT teach treason laws, the greatest crime against a nation; hence today, we find our nation and our freedom in the most critical situation. How could this happen you may ask? The answer to this can be found in the descriptively accurate words of Cicero Marcus Tullius, born on 3 January, 106 BC and murdered on 7 December, 43 BC:

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

This is so precisely true of what is taking place today, not only in Britain, but other countries of the Commonwealth, and the USA - this is the Common Purpose. We and our colleagues both in the UK and USA, are deeply concerned with the direction that both our nations are heading, yet so many seem woefully ignorant. This is not because people are stupid but they lack time and interest to inform themselves, largely because of the education system and mass media control with mind manipulations. We see and hear people acting like sheep, unheeded by the ever emerging totalitarian state, unquestioning, unwilling to research and blindly accepting lies and half-truths from those who can only be best described at misinformed and in the main, deliberate liars.


Part of this disinformation relates to our Council Tax in the UK. For the benefit of our overseas readers, Council Tax is a tax on domestic property collected by local councils in the UK. The council is supposed to use this revenue to pay for local services such as schools, rubbish (garbage) collection, roads and street lighting, etc.
Fiscal Prerogative

Elizabeth felt driven to research the issue of Council Tax accounts, having observed various related, suspicious news articles in the press one of which involved the North West Regional Council of the UK purchasing a house in Brussels, a totally inappropriate action in view of the sufferings of the Cumbrian fishermen and farmers. This alarmed her to the fact that she might well, as a law abiding honest Council Tax payer, be assisting in the potential breakup of her country. We must emphasise that Constitutional Law is not a matter of politics, whether one votes to drive on the left or the right, but a matter of law like the dividing of Britain into ‘Lander’ such as the county of Kent becoming part of France, and Wales becoming part of Ireland etc. That is against our law and Elizabeth said she could not pay for the destruction of the sovereignty of this country. She then asked for full disclosure of how her Council Tax is being spent. This has not been forthcoming because of the liability order against her; the order is an executive order and in Britain alone is governed by the Royal Prerogative. The Enforcement Officer and people in charge of the courts refused to admit that the Liability Order could be challenged in any way. According to the Petition of Right of 1627 all taxation should be honoured by Parliament, under the Royal Assent and Parliament cannot pass acts that are against our Constitution.

Elizabeth further discovered a covert plan to do with the regional assemblies. These are voluntary bodies that are designed to break up England, e.g. Northumberland up to Carlisle will became part of Germany. This was not mentioned in the Labour Party manifesto.

Amongst the papers she handed to the judge at her trial, were the details of Common Purpose and their assemblies, which have increased by 500% since the year 2000. Taxation emanates from the Chancellor’s Office and these are illegal under what is known as the ‘fiscal prerogative’ and the ‘Petition of Right’. Because these assemblies are voluntary bodies, they are not available for funding by the taxpayer. Our Constitution states that ‘all laws’ that go through Parliament ‘must have Royal Assent, in order to become law.’ Instead, they are now validated on a false claim that the Royal Assent is automatic. However, the power to grant this is part of the prerogative, which it impassable.
The automatic assent was invented by the Fabian Prime Minister Asquith who gave the qualification based on the premise that Queen Ann had been the last monarch to send back a bill. The implication being that the monarch could not send back bills, whereas in fact, their power lies in the support of our Constitutional Laws by refusing to give Assent to bills that are unconstitutional.
The Parliament Act

In fact Edward VII had refused to pass the Parliament Act in 1910 and as such Asquith had to go to the country for a vote which he lost. A plan was devised to get this bill back, so he invited 40 Fabian Socialists and 82 Sien Fien to join his party in order to destroy the House of Lords which had been holding on to the fiscal prerogative and in so doing he set out to destroy the British Constitution.

The Parliament Act is actually illegal under the Constitution and the 1848 Treason and Felony Act, which states that neither House, Lords nor the Commons has power above the other. The 1911 Act altered the ‘fiscal power,’ which according to our Constitution cares for all taxpayers, as stated under the Petition of Right (part of the Constitution - No taxation without representation). This puts taxation illegally into the hands of the majority political party in the Commons, and without any amendment allowed from the House of Lords.

At the time of the French Revolution and the American Independence, political parties weren’t fixed as in the Masonic Constitution of America, which is based on the principal of divide and rule. Whereas in Britain, the British Constitution was made by the People for the People and the monarch holds them together according to our Constitutional laws. In relation to this fact, Elizabeth put forward to the judge the question of Brussels acting illegally under European Laws which invalidated the court itself. e.g. the 1988 Mercantile Shipping Act in relation to Spaniards fishing within the British 12 mile limit. Brussels overruled it and fined the British £300,000. In doing this Brussels claimed rights over our Sovereign and Parliament who had passed the Act. She pointed out to the court under this ruling it had no validity. At which point the judge shut her up and said, “I am under contract to make a liability order against you since the order allowed no exception.”

This is entirely against our constitutional laws. Elizabeth then asked for leave to appeal. The judge replied, “You can do what you like.”

Elizabeth explained to the judge that Queens Council has given her his opinion, “Technically under the Rules of Erskine May, it is stated the Automatic Assent, if not complied with, would invalidate ALL laws since 1911”.
Common law

Elizabeth’s Plaint lays the ground for important legal and Constitutional constraints which are being side-stepped and their legal validity is being denied by our present legal system and government. The fact they are still part of our British Common law is undeniable, Sir Edward Coke said, “The Royal Prerogative is part of the Personality of the Monarch and could not be taken from them even by an Act if Parliament” which the Law Lords Halbury and Jowitt agree. (Halbury’s Laws, The Birth Right of the People of England (These are legal reference books of great prestige).

Since the Assent is given under the regal ‘Prerogative Power,’ it is invalid if it is given to an unconstitutional act. So in a different way, both Counsel’s opinion and Elizabeth’s lead to the same conclusion. Therefore, she says that one can conclude that ALL of the bills that have been made law since 1911, which includes 1972 entry into Europe, and all that follows, together with the Civil Contingencies Bill, the constitutional Reform Act, Equality Act and the Immigration Act ARE VOID.
It is clear that our entry into the European Union is INVALID, ILLEGAL and against our Constitution. Treason has been committed and should be remedied.

Once asked Elizabeth why she was making this potentially dangerous and difficult stance at her time of life. She replied:
“I do it for my children, grandchildren and for all our ancestors - all those who have died for our freedom. Do you want to see your children in chains? I was in India during the war and knew about the fight against the Japanese and I knew about the earlier war and I quote John Edmonds... ‘When You Go Home, Tell Them Of Us And Say, For Their Tomorrow, We Gave Our Today’” ~ John Maxwell Edmonds (1875 -1958). She went on to say: “Talk about the Constitution. Research it. Know it. Know that it exists and help to keep it alive against the evil forces dedicated to its destruction.”

Elizabeth also suggested the following: Readers should consider raising the following points as set out below, with their local council. Bear in mind that it is probable that Common Purpose is operating in your area. Councils cannot take taxes for an organisation that cannot achieve an audit. It is illegal under the Local Government Act 1972, which is still used for auditing local government accounts. All those who pay Council Tax should write to their local council and quote section 239 of the 1972 ACT.

1). You as the Council have the right to oppose or depose acts in Parliament.
Under your oaths of allegiance, the laws in the Bill of Rights of 1689 make clear this country CANNOT be ruled by ANY foreign power: “No foreign Prince, person, Prelate, State, or Potentate, hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction, Power, Superiority, Pre eminence, or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm.”
They also added two codicils at the end of the Bill of Rights “Any amendments to the bill after the 23 October 1689 shall be void and not lawful, and this bill is for all time”.

2). This law and its oath are not subject to Parliament because they were given to Parliament by the People whose WILL is supreme over Parliament.
This means Parliament may not allow any part of the aforementioned oath to be breached side-stepped or ignored. This Bill of Rights precludes and effectively forbids Parliament from passing any bill like the 1972 EEC Act, the Treaty of Rome or any other European legislation which gives them any say at all in the governance of England. It also precludes Parliament from passing any laws contrary to the spirit of this Bill of Rights.

Chief Justice Beresford said; “You must look on the spirit of the law not just how it is written.”
The Scots have their own version of this law. Indeed the people and Parliament were told the 1972 EEC Act was a purely trading agreement with no Constitutional impact at all!

3). Since you use the Local Government Act for your audit, I wish to draw your attention to another services’ misdemeanour and that is you have been paying my council tax in to an unaudited administration (this is the 13th year).

4). If I were to pay my Council Tax I would be complicit in this illegality. Even more seriously, I would be allowing without complaint, the present Government’s intention to herd this country over to this illegal administration.

5). Under the powers given to you under section 239 you have the power to refuse to agree this and would be acting illegally if you did not.

6). This applies to any council, PRESS them to ACT under these laws.
Do you want to be like the judge acting illegally under European law? Or do you want to do something about it? We must never forget, our Constitution was made by our ancestors (often with their lives) not by Parliament.

The 'prerogative power' is given to the monarch by the PEOPLE, under the Bill of Rights of 1689 and Magana Carta. The monarch agrees to protect our laws and customs under the Coronation Oath and the Constitution. Failure do so is TREASON against the people! We are protected from GESTAPO type (executive) law by the 'prerogative'. This is what the New World order is trying to take away from us. This is our ancient law. Therefore, why has the monarch signed FIVE illegal treaties taking us into a crimalised organisation -the EU which is completely against our Constitution?

Elizabeth did apply for an interlocutory injunction to stop Brown and his associates taking us, the People of the UK further into an illegal administrative situation. (Anyone can and should do this). It is illegal for a government to be financially involved with an organisation that cannot even audit its own accounts. The EU has not audited its accounts for the past 13 years.

OPEN LETTER TO PRIME MINISTER BROWN.

Dear Mr. Brown

It appears that you are acting under the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005, imagining that you, as a Prime Minister, hold the 'prerogative power.'

Are you sir, aware of the meaning of the 'PREROGATIVE POWER'?
Have you taken constitutional legal advice on this very serious action of entry into the EU?

If so from whom have you sought such advice?

Are you aware that this is a serious crime against the People of Britain? It is TREASON.

Yours Sincerely

Mrs. Elizabeth Beckett

GordonTHE ABOVE QUESTIONS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO ASK MR BROWN BECAUSE - UPON TAKING OFFICE HE MADE A OATH OF ALLIGENCE WHICH INCORPORATES OUR CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND FAILURE TO ABIDE BY THE SAID OATH OF ALLIGENCE IS ALSO TREASON.

We ask readers to please to copy the above letter and replace Elizabeth's name with their own name and send to number 10 Downing Street and see what response they get. All letters received from number 10 Downing Street to the above letter, if any, will published in the Palestine Telegraph. I guess we should not hold our breath waiting because as the end of the day they not longer serve the public that puts them in office.

We should all take a chapter out of the life of dear Mrs. Beckett and reclaim our country from the talons of the New World Order. I have included the following timeline as published in the Namaste Magazine covering the latter part of Elizabeth’s life leading up to her death:

24th December 2007

* There is a delay in the appeal for judicial review because the court in now informed Elizabeth that since a certificate of service has not been received by the court the case can't move forward. The fact is the certificate of service was faxed to the court on 1st December by a government employee on Elizabeth's behalf. She also has a letter from the local council dated 8th December, confirming receipt of the certificate of service and she has sent copies of the said letters to the court. Thus Elizabeth has asked the court for an upgrading of her case which has been delayed because they claimed they had not received the certificate of service.
* A notice is about to be served on Elizabeth for a court hearing in February 2008 to implement the bankcruptcy order made against her in March 2007. The hearing will take place in Carlisle.
* Interestingly, the interlocutory injunction filed by Elizabeth to stop Brown and his associates taking us, the People of the UK further into an illegal administrative situation, seems to be delayed lost in the system. How unusual!

The hearing for the implementation for the liability order against Elizabeth will take place on the 6th February 2008 at Carlisle Court, Rickergate at 2.40pm. This was to validate the extent of her liability because her income is so low which has now been dealt with.

27th February 2008

* Thanks to the generous donations received by members of the public, we were able to pay into court the £1,293.97 required to prevent the bankruptcy order against Elizabeth's being executed. Her home has been saved for now. Nevertheless, Elizabeth still intends pursue her case against the illegal Liability Order

27 May, 2008

* The legal advice that as been given to Elizabeth is that she should have professional to help in putting her case together so that it can go forward. This needs some reformulation for resubmission of her application before the administrative High Court.

21 June, 2008

* Today, Elizabeth has been advised by the Penrith Magistrates that they have passed a Liability Order against her, for refusal to pay her Council tax. She has taken this stance in order that she can take her case foreword and therefore continues to pursue her application for judicial review against the illegality Liability Order in the Council Tax Act of 1992. Penrith Council have informed her she can appeal her case which she fully intends to do.
* Further updates on Elizabeth's situation will be posted as and when we have more information. Please note, that what Elizabeth is doing, for all of us, not just for herself, and therefore she needs all our support!

7 February, 2009

* It is with great sadness that we share the news of the passing of Mrs. Elizabeth Beckett after her fight against leukemia. Elisabeth was the daughter of a High Court judge. The fact she managed one last shot across the bows of the nation's ever-dwindling sovereignty says so much about her steadfastness.

To close Part 4 of this series I will print a copy of her last letter to the Queen before passing away. This will not be the last we hear of Elizabeth Beckett as I intend to print another classical letter she wrote. This astute lady will never be forgotten and as we will see many others are taking up the fight…….in the meantime read and enjoy:

Her Majesty The Queen
Buckingham Palace
London SW1A 1AA 21 January 2009

Unconstitutional reign

Madam
Giving careful consideration to the mode of address in this letter, although in courtesy I have addressed it in conventional manner, it is clear that having, in effect, abdicated by failure to perform your coronation oath you leave the people of this nation without effective titular head to whom we may address our petitions. I write to you only in your pre-eminence in Common Law.
I write on Edmund Burke's remark that for evil to flourish it is sufficient for good men to do nothing.
At your coronation you swore on oath to rule this country according to our laws and customs. This contract with us was written clearly in Magna Carta and replicated by Edward I in 1274. After saying that he would give no such oath, the archbishops, bishops, barons and freemen said that, in this case, they would get another king.

In Magna Carta it was made clear that if the monarch went against this oath then chapter 61 would apply, the contract would be broken and the monarch would have to give up his position and possessions. You have, throughout your reign, disregarded our laws and customs in the legislation that has gone through Parliament.

I believe that you have done this on the basis of the Fabian inspired Parliament Act of 1911 which argued untruthfully that since royal assent had never been denied by a monarch since 1707 (when Queen Anne sent back a Bill) the use of the royal assent had fallen into abeyance. This claim was untrue and treasonable. Only the year before, Asquith had been forced to go to the country by Edward VII who sent back the same Bill to Parliament. And indeed monarchs had refused assent on at least six other occasions since 1707. On each occasion this refusal of assent was because the Bills concerned breached our constitution.
In other words, the 1911 claim, is incorrect and the monarch's assent was never and can never be deemed unnecessary or automatic, even though George V chose to accept that the royal assent was now a formality and that the monarch could not, in reality refuse assent - as in the Northern Ireland Bill.

Despite all the long years of your reign this method of agreement, either forced on you, or under "automatic assent" nevertheless cannot be upheld as lawful.

Many people who have written to you on constitutional matters have received replies from your secretary (most recently, Sonia Bonici) saying that their letter had been forwarded to the government department misleadingly called the Department of Constitutional Affairs and Ministry of Justice. Your compliance with this has permitted the judiciary under these government departments to claim, as in the Chagos Archipelago appeal, that our fundamental liberties do not exist and that the peoples of these islands have no rights under our law.

I am old and now seriously ill. I cannot die without making clear to you that you have broken your oath to us your people.

The 1911 act purports to permit taxes to be levied on us merely by a majority in the House of Commons and without reference to the upper chamber. This again is against our constitution and specifically not permitted by our Petition of Right of 1627. The most serious instance of this is the use of our taxes to fund the banking system of this country: this is being explained to the electorate as a step which will in some way make us rich, whilst in fact it is not only unlawful, but a most serious abrogation of our rights and your duties under our constitution.

Your contract with the people of this country and the colonies and dominions cannot be destroyed by the chicanery of the Fabians in the 1911 Act, nor by subsequent legislation. If you have the courage to fulfil your contract, however belatedly, you could prorogue Parliament now and have a free election with or without party divisions so that this country can go forward in a proper and united way to remove us from the difficulties that have ensued since the 1911 Parliament Act.

Yours Faithfully,
Elisabeth Beckett Copy to:
The Archbishop of Canterbury

JusticeI am sure readers would agree that this person represents what we all feel but never have the courage to act upon. I would like to congratulate the Namaste Web Page for their gallant effort in trying to bring this to the world’s attention. It is rather sad that once again we see the British Media neglecting the British Public in bringing this out into the open. It goes without saying that Elizabeth Beckett never gave up in her fight for justice and to retain the traditions of the United Kingdom. I therefore dedicate this article in her name.… [edit, just corrected topic title from laws to statutes, hopefully. Si]
whistleblower
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 6:49 am

Re: All UK laws since 1911 void

Postby holy vehm » Wed May 05, 2010 8:26 am

Another great post wb :yes:

Those that have for so long commited treason against the great people of this land have no option but to continue what they are doing, they have no other option. They have commited so many crimes against humanity that the only option is in my opinion the death penalty and they know it, they know that if the truth were ever to emerge they would probably lose their life and all there possesions and property.

Much respect to elizabeth, i had heard of her in the past but i had know idea she had passed away. We must all take inspiration from people like elizabeth, when people sit there saying " What can i do" the answer must always be " do something" because to do nothing must be the greatest crime of all.

:peace:
hv
"A ruler who violates the law is illegitimate. He has no right to be obeyed. His commands are mere force and coercion. Rulers who act lawlessly, whose laws are unlawful, are mere criminals".
User avatar
holy vehm
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 3077
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:17 pm
Location: http://www.fmotl.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=9142

Re: All UK laws since 1911 void

Postby bustachemtrails » Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:33 am

That was a very concise and moving article whistleblower, I am very sad to know that Elizabeth has now passed away. I lost contact with her a few years after she moved to the vicarage in Cumbria after she lost the hilltop farm that she owned here in Calne. she was constantly under attack for her verasity and courage and the banksters repossessed the farm.

Elizabeth was my mentor for 2 years and a great friend, she set me upon the path that i still am on to this day. Through Elizabeth i learned all about treason and our constitution, the way the government really work illegally and tyrannically ! She was considered eccentric by many that thought they knew her, and indeed she was not to be trifled with lol...yet she was the only sane and sovereign being i knew back then and she gave me sanctuary, wisdom and courage.

I did not know she had passed away until i read this post tonight...i will carry on the struggle in honour of her spirit and that of our ancestors whom also gave their lives and commitment to safeguard our children's right to self governance. I celebrate her life in the knowledge that even in death she is still with us in this struggle. They shall never keep her down !
With eternal love and respect. David.



I
bustachemtrails
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:19 pm
Location: Devizes, wiltshire

Re: All UK laws since 1911 void

Postby Veronica » Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:43 am

Member elizabeth beckett, who joined this Forum a year ago, is Elizabeth Beckett's granddaughter.

This Topic should be called "All UK Statutes since 1911 void" ... but then all UK Statutes (in total) only carry the force of law by consent ... so they are ALL void as far as I'm concerned.

To write "All UK law since 1911 void" contributes to the ingrained DOUBLE-THINK that "Statutes are Law" when they are THE EXACT OPPOSITE of "Law", as I explain here.

Only when we rid ourselves of this constant DOUBLE-THINK will we ever make any progress. While we continue to write "All UK laws since 1911 void" we are doomed to fail.

What's missing from all this is the bigger picture. The fact that the Saxe-Coburg Gothas are a fundamental part of the psychopathic New World Order (and all THAT means!)

(And the fact that the ONLY way forward is a SOVEREIGN REPUBLIC ... with a PROPER Constitution)
Freedom's just another word for: "Nothing left to lose" (Janis Joplin)
"There is no path to peace, peace IS the path" (Mahatma Ghandi)
"There is no path to freedom, freedom IS the path" (Veronica Chapman)
User avatar
Veronica
Founder
Founder
 
Posts: 4525
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:28 pm
Location: Feltham, Sovereign Republic of England

Re: All UK laws since 1911 void

Postby BaldBeardyDude » Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:58 am

Well said V!

One small point I would make is one of my usuals: One of a newly-elected MP's first tasks is to swear alleigance to the monarch and so away from those who elected them originally, so...

When the monarch calls the assembled puppets 'My Governemnt', this is EXACTLY what she means - they owe her thier alleigance, not us. How can they take her power when they are sworn to do her bidding? Double-think in action.
Do not fall for the BS peeps - use your noggins and work it out!
They must find it hard to take Truth for authority who have so long mistaken Authority for Truth - Gerald Massey
User avatar
BaldBeardyDude
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 2256
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:42 am
Location: Telford, Shropshire

Re: All UK laws since 1911 void

Postby bustachemtrails » Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:32 pm

Very good points raised in this thread about double think. It is very reassuring to me that this forum contains this level of vigilance and wealth of knowledge to bring these points to light. I missed the glaringly obvious fault in the post title myself and appreciate the correction.

I agree wholeheartedly that the monarchy in this country is there as an imposter, to my limited understanding of the subject the rightful heirs to the throne were possibly the ' Stewart's,' who were usurped the position whilst in exile. If memory serves me correctly, King George V was something like 50th in line for the throne when he was crowned.

Queen Elizabeth the ii was not 'placed' to uphold her coronation oath and therefore uphold the will of the people, yet this is so incredulous to most sheeple that it will be a hard fact to swallow for some.

For example, whilst i was explaining a few weeks ago to a policyman about treason, and when i asked him " don't you care about your children's future !?" he retorted with some passion that he had fought in three wars for 'queen and country' ! if i could have at that time, provided him with the absolute proof of whom he was actually fighting for, i do not believe he would/could accept the truth anyway, as he would have to then accept that he was fighting illegal wars for a treasonous quisling government run by the corporation's, with the monarch in a state of silent suzerainty, with the head of the country now being the European commission ! ( or so they so arrogantly believe ) He would have to admit to his self that his whole life's carrier has been based upon lies. It's a tough one !

I think the only way we can expose the depth of this deception is to concentrate on Treason when we deal with any government agency. If anyone representing the government infringes upon my common law rights, i intend to send them a ' notice of understanding of Misprison of Treason and intent'. As it is to my understanding that once 'noticed' (evidence supplied) of the Treasonous government that they choose with their 'free will' to represent, then they have a lawful duty to report this crime to the relevant authority or face the charge of 'misprison of Treason', and if they do not show proof of a police report within a reasonable time, then i would have a lawful duty under the treason act to submit the evidence to my local police. I call this strategy lawful attack. Bit extreme ? ( the situation requires extreme action i believe) any thoughts ?
bustachemtrails
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:19 pm
Location: Devizes, wiltshire

Re: All UK laws since 1911 void

Postby holy vehm » Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:48 pm

I care not who the king or queen is, no person shall rule over me but I.
Is there a king, is there a queen? Not in my society there isnt.

bustachemtrails wrote:I think the only way we can expose the depth of this deception is to concentrate on Treason when we deal with any government agency. If anyone representing the government infringes upon my common law rights, i intend to send them a ' notice of understanding of Misprison of Treason and intent'. As it is to my understanding that once 'noticed' (evidence supplied) of the Treasonous government that they choose with their 'free will' to represent, then they have a lawful duty to report this crime to the relevant authority or face the charge of 'misprison of Treason', and if they do not show proof of a police report within a reasonable time, then i would have a lawful duty under the treason act to submit the evidence to my local police. I call this strategy lawful attack. Bit extreme ? ( the situation requires extreme action i believe) any thoughts ?


Like it. :yes:
would you post up a copy of the notice when you have written it.
"A ruler who violates the law is illegitimate. He has no right to be obeyed. His commands are mere force and coercion. Rulers who act lawlessly, whose laws are unlawful, are mere criminals".
User avatar
holy vehm
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 3077
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:17 pm
Location: http://www.fmotl.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=9142

Re: All UK laws since 1911 void

Postby bustachemtrails » Tue Jun 01, 2010 5:23 pm

Sure, my only question is would all of the evidence need be written in the notice, or would a disc with the relevant evidence accompanying the notice suffice ?
bustachemtrails
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:19 pm
Location: Devizes, wiltshire

Re: All UK laws since 1911 void

Postby Farmer » Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:57 pm

If councils refuse to object then control must be taken of the councils. The courts will never rule correctly in this matter. We are being attacked on several fronts and need to do the same. At the end of the day, the people have always needed to take matters into their own hands.
If you're scared of 'them' poisoning 'us' with some shit then maybe you haven't noticed the shit they are already poisoning us with.
- prajna - fmotl.co.uk forum 2011
User avatar
Farmer
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:07 am

Re: All UK laws since 1911 void

Postby bustachemtrails » Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:21 pm

TO
Nazi H.Q.
Everywhere,
Arrogant House,
La la land.
Doomsville.
Imat urd.

From:
Dai of the slowly Family (as commonly called)
Spinedis Lodge,
Rope end Road,
Gotcha.
Icuh ung.

Sent by first class recorded post.

Date.
NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING OF MISPRISION OF TREASON AND INTENT.
(THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN SERVED UPON 'YOUR PERSON'.)

Dear sheep,
PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE THOROUGHLY AND CAREFULLY.
IT IS A NOTICE. A LAWFUL DOCUMENT AND EVIDENCE. IT INFORMS YOU. IT MEANS
WHAT IT SAYS. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS OF THE UTMOST URGENT
NATURE AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE AND URGENT ATTENTION !

Please be aware that failure to Act upon this 'notice' in accordance with the 1795
Treason Act which being the current law of this realm, contravenes the lawful duty
of every/any British sovereign man/woman within or without the realm of the United
Kingdom and is an OFFENCE under the ' Misprision of Treason Act 1795,' section 1.
whereby;..'it is an OFFENCE' at common law ("misprision of Treason"-see Halsbury's
statutes, 4th edition vol 11,p.818 ) for any person who knows that Treason is being
planned or committed, not to report the same AS SOON AS he/she can to a justice of
the peace.

Also be aware that the penalty for committing 'Misprision of Treason' in this day
is life imprisonment. And that my sole intention in informing you of this fact in
law is one of duty and not malice, menace, frivolity nor ill will.

As you have made UNLAWFUL DEMANDS on my 'person', and/or have advised me to
comply with statutes by threat of enforcement, and that you are acting for a
corporation whom have committed the crime's of 'sedition and treason at common
law (evidence herein supplied), and that I DO NOT and WILL NOT support
FINANCIALLY OR IN ANY OTHER WAY this evil treachery indeed our constitutional
law FORBIDS ME TO DO SO ! it is therefore my intention and lawful and honourable
duty to inform you that, although your action's must be deemed to be the will of
your peer's and in your 'apparent ignorance' at this juncture in time. YOU MUST
NOW BY THE COMMON LAW'S OF THIS REALM with the evidence herein supplied,
CEASE AND DESIST ALL ACTIONS pertaining to the will of said peer's, in light of the
evidence that has NOW been OFFICIALLY presented to YOUR PERSON in good faith
by lawful notice. Failure to do so is an Act of 'Misprision of Treason' at common
law.

Furthermore, under the Treason Act 1795 section 1, if you do not CEASE AND DESIST
from ALL evidenced, (herein presented) UNLAWFUL actions, I shall in point of fact
have no alternative under the laws of this land, other than to conclude that YOU DO
Act for said peer's in 'DISHONOUR' of YOUR 'LAWFUL DUTIES', and with 'FULL
KNOWLEDGE', and with 'FREE WILL', despite the evidence of Sedition and Treason
concisely addressed and presented herein.

It is my honourable duty then, as one sovereign being to another, and so that I
may not be coerced into ANY CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES by supporting this EVIL and
' TREASONOUS CORPORATION ' that you do represent and by ' YOUR OWN WILL l', (that
which must be deemed to be but the will of your peer's, and that you be in apparent
ignorance at this juncture in time), to inform you of YOUR CRIMINAL INVOLVEMENT
and CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS against my 'Person', and that if you do not CEASE AND
DESIST IN ALL ACTIONS pertaining to the will of your peer's IMMEDIATELY upon
receipt of this concise and complete lawful notice, it shall be my
lawful duty to report the evidence, that which would be a copy of this Lawfully
served 'Notice of understanding of Misprision of Treason and intent', to a Justice of
the peace for the extremely serious crime of 'MISPRISION OF TREASON' at common
law. And I would do so with haste and extreme prejudice.

As I am sincerely concerned as to your lawful position and welfare whilst you are
in the employ of 'said' traitor's, please be aware that this is not a threat it is merely
a statement of fact presented in good faith and not intended to mislead.

THEREFORE, where it is to my understanding and evidenced herein that:
1. A long range deception strategy to create a single Federal European state with
the erosion of each nation's sovereignty, currency and the powers to determine it's
own laws and affairs, was finalised by the Geo-political centre of the third Reich in
Berlin 1942. This was done with the effect that should the Nazis lose the war ,
militarily, they could continue their plans for a European dictatorship economically,
through corporatism, and political subversion.

Their future shape of Europe is detailed in the seminars entitled 'Europaische
wirtschaftsgemeinschaft ' ( public document worldcat OCLC number 31002821 ).
Translated into English as 'European Economic Community' which has been herein
presented as evidence.
The chapter headings of this Nazi document were replicated almost verbatim in
the 1992 Maastricht Treaty.

2. Since the end of the war, divers treasonous persons, groups and movements with
this ideology, have conspired to build on this agenda which has become known as
the European Union.

3. The involvement of the United Kingdom in this agenda began in 1948 with the
formation of the European movement. This was a state funded Anglo-French pro-
federal European lobbying body posing as a non-Governmental grass roots pressure
group. A document outlining the detailed origins of this movement has been
presented herein as evidence.

4.The said movement is still publicly active today lobbying for total European
integration and a European constitution.

5.The first move towards a federal Europe did not involve Britain directly, it was
the signing of the Treaty of Rome in 1957 by Germany, France, Italy, Belgium
Luxembourg and the Netherlands.

6. Meticulous research has uncovered a wealth of official, archived documents
from the period 1970-72 which shows the deceit perpetrated by the ruling elite at
the time and these documents have been released after the thirty year rule.

7.The common law applies to all sovereign living breathing men and women and
dictates that we are all born free to do what we choose for ourselves provided we
do not cause harm, injury or loss to another's life, liberty or property or their rights
to life, liberty or property.

8. England, within the United Kingdom of Great Britain is a common law
jurisdiction and British parliament has no lawful authority ever to breach, surrender,
land, or transfer, even temporarily, sovereignty except when conquered in war.

9. No one ( neither monarch,nor prime minister, nor any prelate, politician, judge
or public servant ) is above the common law of Great Britain that forms the British
constitution (Magna Carta 1215, The Declaration and Bill of Rights 1688/89, the
Coronation Oath Act 1689 and the Act's of Union succession and settlement
1701-07).

10.The Declaration of rights 1688 is an unrebutted claim of right by the people
and therefore beyond the reach of parliament and still stands to this day. That
declaration includes the clause no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or
potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence
or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm. This is mirrored in the
Bill of Rights 1689 which still stands as legislation.

11. Treason in statute law was redefined by the Treason Act 1795 for the principal
forms to include;
a) compassing the death or serious injury of the sovereign or his (or her) spouse or
eldest son;
b) levying war against the sovereign in his (or her realm), which includes , any
insurrection against the authority of the sovereign or of the Government that goes
beyond riot or violent disorder;
c) giving aid or comfort to the sovereign's enemies in wartime.

12. Treason at common law is the offence of attempting to overthrow the
Government of a state to which the offender owes allegiance; or of betraying
the state into the hands of a foreign power.

13. Sedition at common law means overt conduct such as speech and organisation,
that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward insurrection against the
established order. Sedition includes the subversion of a constitution and
incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority.

14.The evidence presented in the 'shoe horned into the EU ' files shows that the
Heath Government of 1972 was well aware that an essential loss of British
sovereignty would occur within thirty years with the passing of the European
Communities Bill and knew it would, in all likelihood, be rejected if brought to
the people, which of course it was not. This in itself is an Act of Sedition at
common law.

15. The passage of the European Communities Act in 1972, establishing the
principle that European law would always prevail over British law in the event
of a clash, thereby overthrowing the supremacy of the British parliament, was
a criminal Act of Treason at common law by the Heath Administration.

16. The signing of the single European Act in 1986 reducing Britain's
independent decision making powers further by extending majority voting in
certain areas of policy making, was a criminal Act of Treason at common
law by the Thatcher Administration.

17. The signing of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, based on the original EEC Berlin
document 1942, surrendering sovereign powers of the Queen in parliament to an
unelected body in Europe this was a criminal Act of Treason at common law by
the Major Administration.

18. The signing of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997 increased the European Union's
powers for action at community level. This included further European Integration
in legislative, police, judicial, customs and security matters and strengthened
Europol. The signing of this Treaty was a further Act of Treason at common law
by the Blair Administration.

19. With the full knowledge of this Treason and to escape prosecution, the Blair
Government repealed the Treason legislation in section 36 of the 'crime and
disorder Act' of 1998, abolishing the death penalty. This including the repealing
of the Treason Act 1795. However, the crime of Treason at common law still
stands as common law has primacy. A document outlining these changes to the
statute has been presented herein as evidence.

20.The signing of the Nice Treaty in 2001 and the EU constitution in 2004 were
further Acts of Treason at common law by the Blair Administration.

21 In an attempt to further protect themselves against criminal prosecution the
Blair Government removed the word 'sovereignty' from the oath of office of
constables in the 'police Reform Act 2002 (section,83), and also modified the
legislation to enable non British nationals to become officers (section.82).
These are Acts of both Sedition and Treason at common law. A document
outlining these changes to the statute's has been presented as evidence herein.

22. The signing of the Lisbon Treaty in 2008 surrendered further control of policy
including that related to immigration and borders. This was a further crime of
Treason at common law by the Brown Administration.

23. The Treasury department of the European Community has never allowed an
independent audit by professional accountants of their books in the last 14 years.
One year of non-publication is a criminal offence.
In fact, it's financial accounts have been disapproved by the EU's own court of
auditors for the past 14 years running.

This crime has already been reported to the UK serious fraud office by former
MP Ashley Mote. They are in possession of the evidence and have confirmed to
him that the remittance of British taxpayer's funds into the hands of this criminal
enterprise is, of course, a criminal offence.

24. A signed letter written to former constable of Thames valley police, Albert
Burgess, from Leolin Prince Q C on the subject of the Heath Treason evidence
states that the case he ( Burgess ) puts forward is 'arguable' and does 'merit
serious consideration and investigation'. To the best of my knowledge the letter
is authentic and a copy has been herein presented as evidence.

25. The six EU Treatise since 1972 are unlawful and should be struck completely
from the statute books.
The evidence contained within this 'notice of understanding of Misprision of
Treason and intent', is in point of fact, evidence enough in itself and IN IT'S
ENTIRETY and should be laid before a Justice of the peace by YOURSELF in order
for you to report 'said' crimes, and in doing so, redeem yourself from any willing
involvement in this most serious of plots of which you have been made fully aware,
and I strongly urge that you do so as soon as is reasonably possible. Let it be
known to you that, I have already submitted the evidence herein and more, to my
local police force for investigation. And that I am a 'Freeman on the land' in Lawful
Rebellion' under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215.

Be it known to you that, I have served upon Her majesty Queen Elizabeth II,
two lawful, officially sworn, witnessed and signed affidavit's, that does; "Remove
myself from All and Any Allegiance to Elizabeth the Queen, to the purpose of
removing myself at law from the authority of all of those Hateful and evil persons
who have taken it upon themselves to hold Elizabeth the Queen a prisoner in her
own land".
I include a copy of my second affidavit (and a copy of its receipt of postage) as
evidence herein and proof of my lawful position.

THEREFORE, be it known to you ( who I have served this
Notice on), that I the injured party, do seek remedy and justice in requesting your
assistance in bringing the perpetrator's of these evil crimes before a justice of the
peace.

I hereby solemnly ask that you do, stand with me with courage at this time
against an entrenched, covert enemy that with premeditated and long meticulous
planning have, and to this day still are, conspiring to destroy the custom's, Rights
and freedoms of the common people's of the United Kingdom and Great Britain.

And I do solemnly ask that you do, by duty and by law, stand with me against this
treason for sake and liberty and well being of all innocent and ignorant soul's
of this our sovereign land, and to report said offences as soon as you can to
a Justice of the peace.

1.2 million British souls died in two world war's to safeguard our people's right to
self governance, We must not allow their selfless valour to be forgotten at this
time, we must recognise in each of us, that it is our individual duty to show the
same valour and courage against the very same enemy that they fought. Yet be
encouraged, as the people against this treasonous plot are now many, and sleeping
dogs lie, together we shall be successful in bringing the guilty to justice, and
we shall take back this our land with the spirit and courage of our convictions.

WARNING AND FAIR NOTICE.
As this matter is of the most serious nature, I give you fair notice that if I do not
receive word from you within seven (7) working days on receipt of this notice, to
provide and confirm to my understanding that, you are not in league with this
treasonous plot, and that YOU have resigned from undertaking their and YOUR
(ignorant) criminal activities, and that you have reported said crime's to a justice
of the peace as soon as you were able.

In the event that you should decide to ignore this 'notice', I shall, after seven (7)
days have elapsed from you receiving this 'notice of understanding of misprision
of treason and intent', take a copy of 'said' notice hereby served on your person,
and present it as evidence to a justice of the peace for YOUR alleged involvement
and CRIMINAL activity in this ONGOING treasonous plot. It is to my understanding
that, under the common law of this land of which I am lawfully bound to uphold,
this would duly result in YOURSELF facing IMMEDIATE ARREST under section 1 of
the Treason Act 1795, for the CRIMINAL OFFENCE of ' MISPRISION OF TREASON.'
at common law. Furthermore, let it be known to you that I shall, in the event
that it be required, testify and stand as witness against you in a properly
convened court de jure.

I must advise you in my knowledge to investigate the motives, intent and
origins of the registered British charity known as ' common purpose.' And to make
you aware that this charity is a tool of the 'plotter's' for which to 'shoehorn'
the minds of selected individuals by way of neuro linguistic programming (NLP),
so that they do subliminally accept and will work for the goal's and ambition's
of 'said' plotters. And that this organisation does support zealous pro-European
Union ideals, that have and to this day are still, at large within our institution's
at community level for to coerce and deceive the concepts of our youth. And
that this ' common purpose ' acts like a virus upon our freedom's, and has
infected at administration level within our community, the common sense and
loyalty of many of our public servants.

I consider these the greatest crimes perpetrated against the country and
it's people in a thousand years. Those responsible must be brought before a
properly convened court de jure and tried by the people under the common
law of the land.

Be aware that either by your action's or inaction to this notice, you shall lay
bare your intention of allegiance before all common people of this land.
I plead to your reason and compassion as a human being with heart and soul,
please stand alongside your countryman and neighbour, band together with
colleagues and friends against this disease that has spreads like a cancer over
our natural way of life.

I now AFFIRM that all of the foregoing is true and correct and that I am of lawful
age and competent to serve this 'Notice of understanding of Misprision of Treason
and intent'. I hereby affix my own Name to all of the affirmations in this entire
document with explicit reservation of all my natural inalienable Rights and my
specific common law Right not to be bound by any contract or obligation which I
have not entered into knowingly, willingly, voluntarily, and without
misrepresentation, duress, or coercion.

without frivolity, vexation, insincerity, malice or ill will.

Printed/Stamped Name. (as commonly called)

Date.

Enclosed documents as evidence;

a) Copy of letter from Leolin Prince QC to Albert Burgess.
b) Document pertaining to 'police reform Act 2002 sec, 82/83.
c) Public document 'Worldcat OCLC number 31002821.
d) The origin's of the European movement.
e) Documents pertaining to the repealing of the Treason Act
1795 & the repeal of section 36 in the crime and disorder
Act 1998.
f) Copy of affidavit to the Queen and proof of postage.

" the hottest fires in hell are reserved for those who remain neutral
in times of moral crisis." Edmund Burke.
bustachemtrails
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:19 pm
Location: Devizes, wiltshire

Next

Return to Common Law & Statute "Law"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron