Bilderberg

Bilderberg

Postby strawmansarah » Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:02 am

Bilderberg 2012.

Reports on this weekend’s annual Bilderberg conference in the US of NATO’s totalitarian, super-rich, secret government. A look at some of the key participants in the venue where the NATO zone industrialists, royalty and bankers persuade pliable politicians to carry out their plans. Rothschild & Rockefeller families team up for some extra wealth creation. Two centuries old transatlantic dynasties, Rothschilds in Europe and Rockefeller in the US, team up to cash in on the present distressed markets, where they can buy up assets very cheaply and make a killing. Rothschild Investment Trust (RIT) Capital Partners has taken a 37% stake in Rockefeller Financial Services. Victor Rothschild was telling 1970s UK politicians who to appoint as the head of MI5 or MI6. What is Bilderberg? Opinion of author and senior journalism lecturer Stephen Dorril. ‘Martin Bormann, Nazi In Exile’ [PDF] book by former CBS WWII news correspondent Paul Manning reviewed by Martin Summers. Hitler’s deputy Martin Bormann and Nazi flight capital in the years during and after World War II. Dave Emory on his Spitfirelist podcast describes Red House meeting on Thursday 10th August 1944 in Strausbourg, attended by representatives of all main Nazi corporations, which set Bormann’s Nazi flight capital programme in motion. Where did all that looted Nazi wealth end up? Immediate co-operation between the Nazi Bormann network and select Jewish businessmen. Money talks, Nazi money talks, Martin Bormann is dead but his Nazi capital network lives on. Ed Michaud from Trident Research & Recovery describes the laundering of Nazi gold and securities through the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Sullivan and Cromwell law firm in New York. Daily Mail cover this year’s Bilderberg meeting. Gordon Duff from Veterans Today is one voice no longer heard in Britain since Iranian channel, Press TV, was censored by Ofcom in January 2012. Antidote to the Diamond Jubilee as we hear from John Morgan author of the new book ‘Diana Inquest: Who Killed Princess Diana?’ about the circumstances around the meeting of the royal family’s Way Ahead Group (WAG) on Wednesday 23rd July 1997 and why he believes it was there the decision was made, by senior members of the royal family, to assassinate Diana.
[url]http://www.lulu.com/shop/the-lioness/so-they-say-you’ve-broken-the-law-challenging-legal-authority/paperback/product-18485231.html[/url]How to challenge the authority of anyone who claims you have broken the law.
strawmansarah
 
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:00 pm

Re: Coronation - lies

Postby Prajna » Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:18 am

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronation_of_the_British_monarch wrote:Elizabeth II was crowned on 2 June 1953, despite having ascended the throne on 6 February 1952, the instant her father died.


Anyway, who gives a fuck? It is all an illusion.

Namaste
FREEDOM Best Before: 11 Sept 2001
http://tomboy-pink.co.uk/ and http://DeclarePeace.org.uk/
User avatar
Prajna
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 627
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 2:51 pm
Location: UK

Re: Bilderberg

Postby pitano1 » Sat Jun 02, 2012 7:39 pm

i feel this article sums the cunts up nicely.


MEDIA TRY AND CONVINCE US THE ROYAL PARASITE DESERVES OUR DEFERENCE
Comments on an article written by one of the Queen's henchmen Sir David Hare

The monarchy is the symbol of greed and class division - it is telling that the queen has chosen to put on a vulgar display of her diamonds for the Jubilee at a time when many families are suffering a decline in their living standards - she is rubbing the noses of the poor in her great wealth - she could have decided to auction these jewels to be used to provide food and shelter for 'her' dispossessed ratehr than put them on dosplay for the peasants to gawp at

-------------------

What the Queen has taught us then is that to succeed in the Great Britain you just need to get your feet under the table, dig in and just wave at the oiks.

-------------------


But, the Royal Family are at the very centre or should one say, Apex, of the great stink!

-------------------

Republicanism, unlike Monarchism, is a coherent and rational political principal. It doesn't rely on publicity, fawning sycophancy, or vested interests to keep it afloat.
I think David Hare should have made his Knighthood clear to readers; it's salient to his point of view.

-------------------

To put on this display of ostentatiousness in the middle of the most difficult times most of us have ever had shows a determination and steeliness last seen in the emperors of the East. To help this along never has a nation been so grovelling since those days either.

-------------------

We are grateful that there is one British citizen who is not at the mercy of market forces and shameless profiteering

Definitely one of the funniest, most ridiculous things I've read about Betty von Windsor this week.

-------------------

Monarchs were hired to maintain mercantile capitalism back in 1689, that is what the Civil List is, their signing on fee from the Premier League of Aristocracy then running across Europe. They are completely based on market forces. We dont even have a constitution with which we could get rid of them like Europeans have been doing since 1789.
[i disagree with this statement]pitano1
-------------------

Four more days of this shit and then, hopefully, we can return to normal. Even articles pretending the Olympics aren't shit are an improvement on the constant fawning to a woman who has done nothing for this country other than take our money and reinforce the notion that we are inferior to her and her ilk by accident of birth.

-------------------

Possibly the abolition of such feudal relics as knighthoods - Sir David.

-------------------

Everybody's favourite rich German granny, then!

-------------------

Royalty is one of the greatest problems affecting the UK. Whilst few can join "the firm" - and only then via marriage - there are plenty on the gravy train of getting as close as they can be with their little awards for doing bugger all, for doing a job like anyone else, for being one of those dirty politicians, all validated by minor awards to the truly brave and the truly deserving. It's time all this bollocks was dumped and put into history books for our grandchildren to laugh at when they read of such idiotic occasions as this weekend.

-------------------

Reading out a Queen's speech that heralded the demise of the NHS, legal aid. benefits for the disabled and crippling austerity for most of her subjects should have stuck in her throat. It didn't.
That's all we need to know. She'll be looking out of the window at us starving proles and telling us it's our own fault - just like Gideon and Dave.

-------------------

As the oh so accurately lampooned PR person in that brilliant satire on the forthcoming five rings event '2012' suggested, the Jubilympics are upon us. Four days of fierce lickspittle arse licking and fawning from a huge cast of usual suspects replete with 24/7 wall to wall coverage of Mrs Saxe-Cobourg wearing a different pastel shade hat each day. We may be absloute shite in every other department but we are world leaders in national delusion and debasement when it comes to Royalty

-------------------

If I had a personal fortune of £300+ million derived from inherited wealth and had led a life of unbridled luxury due to an accident of birth I dare say I'd be above market forces too. It's hardly a strength though is it?

-------------------

If the queen is as popular as the media seems to think (and apparently it's increasingly necessary to tell us, this). Then an awful lot of people I meet seem to be keeping their love of royalty firmly hidden.

-------------------

If it is to wondered at. As to why the British population,in this modern day and age. Still live in legal subjugation to a monarchy. Without a written constitution,or the legal rights of citizenship.
Well wonder no more. For it is the likes of David Hare. That will perpetuate this absurdity ad nausum.

-------------------

We're told British quality journalism is the best in the world. But when was the last time any journo asked the Queen or her feckless offspring the kind of question they ask tinpot foreign dictators? "How come you live in 7 huge houses, while people in your own country cannot feed their families or heat their homes?"
Instead we get obsequious stuff like "why do people love you so much, maam" or "tell us about your great work for charity, sir". They know they'd get the sack and never work again if they did anything but toe the official line. And none of them will actually put principles above their job.

These journos go to North Korea, comment on the carefully choreographed tribute parades to the unelected leader and the creepy way every member of the public you talk to has nothing but total love and admiration for him. And then come back to blighty and they cannot stop themselves pouring out the same old crap about 'her maj'. Hypocrites.

-------------------

She's the veneer of entrenched capitalism that is capitalism and privileged hierarchy based on wealth.The nauseating stench of brown nosed sycophancy from the ownership of media makes a mockery of democratic equality.

-------------------

Sadly, it's not given that it's already successfully imposed itself on us for centuries. And we still pay taxes for it. And we still celebrate it. And even the author above who dares to write the slightest, meekest of criticisms of the monarchy, has the brass-necked hypocrisy to do so after having accepted a knighthood. Stink indeed.

-------------------

Well Ive had a couple of bucks fizzes and I can think of the perfect socialist expression f*ck off you right wing tosser :)

PS I think royalty is an risible wealth-sucking set of backward pillocks , servilely pampered by dingbats like you but my next door neighbour has invited me to her party so I will go and be a hypocritical champagne socialist! :)

-------------------

Sorry David, but you've lost the plot there.

The Queen, as distinct from Mrs Elizabeth Windsor, is an imaginary construct. She's a bit like the queen in Jean Genet's 'Le Balcon', sitting in an imaginary room, embroidering an imaginary robe.
And that construct is used knowingly by the ruling class to perpetuate the magnificent myth (to use Plato's term) that we are somehow 'all in this together', united by some 'sameness' that sets us apart from 'others'.

That's why earlier attempts by the royals to become 'one of us' (the ill-judged 'It's A Royal Knockout' being a prime example) were doomed to failure.
Popular affection for the royal family exists only to the extent that they remain a blank canvas on which we plebs can embroider our sentimental fantasies of togetherness, solidarity, and decency.

-------------------

If the BBC was balanced and unbiased, as it purports to be, then where is the coverage or representation of the views of the millions of republicans in this country, as we are being force-fed the syrup of an elitist, Monarchist agenda? Indeed, where is that balance in the Guardian?

I find the fawning establishment and the vulgar displays of monetary excess simply gross, while people struggle to make ends meet, while the banksters continue to gloat and demand austerity measures for the rest, while the environment continues to burn and governments continue to pursue war as a means to secure their hegemony: this is the world the 'Queen' - the world's largest land owner, presides over, this is the reality of her 'reign'. Yet she clearly believes in maintaining this status quo, indeed she is a figurehead for it. With vast, vast wealth, and the legalised control of millions of her 'subjects', she is an intrinsic part of Johnny Rotten's 'fascist regime'.

Step down your 'majesty', surrender your rights and land to the people of this world, make a positive difference that is lasting and meaningful, towards peace and prosperity for all, then I will salute you. until then I say fuck the jubilee, and fuck the corporate fascist olympics.

MORE COMMENTS IN THE GUARDIAN ARTICLE WRITTEN BY 'SIR' DAVID HARE HERE

--
INTERNATIONAL MENS ORGANISATION
http://www.intmensorg.info
BACK UP WEB ADDRESS
http://www.internationalmensorganisation.info

The best index to a person's character is how they treat people who can't do them
any good, and how they treat people who can't fight back.


Members only can post to this group at internationalmensorganisation@googlegroups.com
All other emails to editorial@intmensorg.info
If the machine of government is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law.
Henry David Thoreau
ALL UNALIENABLE RIGHTS RESERVED -AB INITIO - Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
pitano1
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1147
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: on the land


Return to News (the Good, the Bad & the Ugly)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron