A rare treat - People v the Banks

Discuss issues relating to the Police Force.

Re: A rare treat - People v the Banks

Postby musashi » Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:46 am

My heart is gladdened by this.

Musashi
It's still fucked, isn't it?
User avatar
musashi
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:21 pm

Re: A rare treat - People v the Banks

Postby Dreadlock » Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:52 am

Just read Tuohy v Bell.

This is what I have gleaned:

A "warrant for possession" is administrative in nature. It is an internal court document.
An "order for possession" is a court order made by the court to a party.

However, a warrant for possession is required to enforce an order should the order be refused, but the warrant may be lawfully resisted as bailiffs cannot use force to gain entry.

So, the bailiffs must next seek a warrant for arrest of anyone resisting the warrant for possession in order for them to enforce the order for possession.

Do I have this right or am I missing something?
Dreadlock
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:08 am

Re: A rare treat - People v the Banks

Postby Prajna » Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:54 pm

FREEDOM Best Before: 11 Sept 2001
http://tomboy-pink.co.uk/ and http://DeclarePeace.org.uk/
User avatar
Prajna
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 627
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 2:51 pm
Location: UK

Previous

Return to Police Jurisdiction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron