the_common_law_reverend_kenny wrote:Whats the specific question.....?
Isn't this trust (fiat) just a way to keep people fiddling about in the dark with a promise of redemption?..........now that D/C is fading is this next big con?
Time will tell. We've had 20 years of d/c and a4v and so on. And i HEAR a 10% success rate. Personally i dont know ANYONE whose done an a4v with success or created a money order or set-off/discharge.
Trusts, well, what IF they were the next best thing? Why dismiss them so easily - ive only been learning about them for 4 months. The two years of d/c got me no where. You will notice Ive not plastered trusts on this forum as Im only just compiling paperwork and a strategy that makes sense and logic to me.
What are REAL tools Ken? ITS ALL A GAME. Even language itself is an illusion, nothing more than vibrations of air.
Even then the meaning of the communication is the one received, not sent. And you only have control over [jurisdiction] the one sent. Same old problem.
Still sounds like the suggestion is to 'go to the foreign camp' cap in hand
NO, the opposite. I will be doing what the FREEMAN misses so much. The FREEMAN has tried presenting his b/c as the strawman.
He has consented at every turn, tricked into jurisdiction just by arriving at court.
Under trust, i make my own law. It is MY LAW that will be in court that day. This will be executed in private chambers.
and attract the hit a hopefull who are looking to settle their so called debt
A shame, cos there is so much more: "Those bound by desire see only that which can be held in their hand." - Bruce Leeroy, The Last Dragon.
No one is forcing anyone to pay $$$ for this knowledge. 98% of it is out there available for free. ;-)
Those people who would pay, are used to paying. There still in that mind set. Its a choice, and Im all about choice...We wouldn't want to take away choice would we?
Regarding the UCC thing. If I stated here, on this public forum, that I hold some property designated as "Financial Trust" have i made the contents public? Would the forum owner or the ISP hoster have some jurisdiction over that property? Is there even property there? You dont know. Thats the point. Do you have any idea what that even relates to?
Like I said, you dont have to use the UCC, dont get hung up on that like so many have. Use a different method. Point is, in trusts land, he who claims trust must prove trust. If you want to do that - how do you? LIke the d/c methods of creating evidence, you need two uninterested parties as witnesses. Could you suggest better methods?
Poor is the man whose pleasures depend upon the permission of another.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value - Zero" - Voltaire 1729